Re: Commodore 64 VS the Colecovision
- From: Pete Rittwage <rcade@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 17:48:04 -0400
The Space Boss wrote:
Jack (www.villagebbs.com) wrote:
I like my Commodores and my Colecovision, but I've never really
compared them.
Well, one being a what $600-$700? Original MSRP Computer and the other
being a $200 Game System.. why would you?
After some careful consideration, Jack, I am going to have to reject
your logic.
After all, the Atari 800 was comprable both pricewise and power wise to
the C=64, and yet they compare the Atari 5200 with the Colecovision,
and Colecovision wins...
Think about it...
The Atari was always *much* more expensive than the Commodore equipment, at least where I was from (Northeastern Ohio). The Atari 800 was something like over $1200 for an 800 and 810 disk drive, where the C64 and 1541 were only $199 each.
--
-
Pete Rittwage
http://rittwage.com999999
C64 Preservation Project
http://c64preservation.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Commodore 64 VS the Colecovision
- From: The Space Boss
- Re: Commodore 64 VS the Colecovision
- References:
- Re: Commodore 64 VS the Colecovision
- From: The Space Boss
- Re: Commodore 64 VS the Colecovision
- Prev by Date: Re: "Fastest Time" on "Perfect" Pitfall
- Next by Date: Re: Commodore 64 VS the Colecovision
- Previous by thread: Re: Commodore 64 VS the Colecovision
- Next by thread: Re: Commodore 64 VS the Colecovision
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|