Re: Undead Persistence, wording of optional press



On Jun 3, 10:49 am, "Frederick Scott" <nos...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I was arguing to drop the near meaningless and hard-to-
express exception to the end of combat because it can easily be
confused for that clause. Basically, if that clause doesn't turn
Undead Persistence into superior Conquer the Beast, then let's get
rid of the clause altogether so no OTHER gaming groups accidentally
turn inferior Undead Persistence into superior Conquer the Beast (because
they're ignorant and mostly because they'd NEVER SUSPECT IN A MILLION
YEARS that people would waste any ink on such a nit :-P ).

The problem, basically, is that because it contains language similar
to "Trap" and "Conquer the Beast", people assume it does the same
thing. They fail to read it closely, and read in a clause that is not
there.

By itself (had Trap or Conquer the Beast never been printed) the card
just isn't that confusing.
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Undead Persistence, wording of optional press
    ... confused for that clause. ... Undead Persistence into superior Conquer the Beast, ... that Meat Hook has been fixed to grant a press only once per combat. ... As I said, read by itself, the card is just not that confusing. ...
    (rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad)
  • Re: Undead Persistence, wording of optional press
    ... if that clause doesn't turn ... Undead Persistence into superior Conquer the Beast, ... It tends to surprise people to have so much ...
    (rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad)
  • Re: Undead Persistence, wording of optional press
    ... I wasn't arguing to reinsert the clause I already ... I was arguing to drop the near meaningless and hard-to- ... Undead Persistence into superior Conquer the Beast, ...
    (rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad)
  • Re: Undead Persistence, wording of optional press
    ... if that clause doesn't turn ... Undead Persistence into superior Conquer the Beast, ... they would have had to have seen it on another card. ... As I said, read by itself, the card is just not that confusing. ...
    (rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad)
  • Re: [python] using try: finally: except
    ... >> it still confusing even though the order of execution changed ... a 'finally' clause had to be the last clause in a ... The finally clause is to finalise code in the try block. ...
    (comp.lang.python)