Re: Undead Persistence, wording of optional press
- From: nystulc@xxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 11:25:33 -0700 (PDT)
On Jun 3, 10:49 am, "Frederick Scott" <nos...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I was arguing to drop the near meaningless and hard-to-
express exception to the end of combat because it can easily be
confused for that clause. Basically, if that clause doesn't turn
Undead Persistence into superior Conquer the Beast, then let's get
rid of the clause altogether so no OTHER gaming groups accidentally
turn inferior Undead Persistence into superior Conquer the Beast (because
they're ignorant and mostly because they'd NEVER SUSPECT IN A MILLION
YEARS that people would waste any ink on such a nit :-P ).
The problem, basically, is that because it contains language similar
to "Trap" and "Conquer the Beast", people assume it does the same
thing. They fail to read it closely, and read in a clause that is not
there.
By itself (had Trap or Conquer the Beast never been printed) the card
just isn't that confusing.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Undead Persistence, wording of optional press
- From: Frederick Scott
- Re: Undead Persistence, wording of optional press
- References:
- Undead Persistence, wording of optional press
- From: Frederick Scott
- Re: Undead Persistence, wording of optional press
- From: lonkka
- Re: Undead Persistence, wording of optional press
- From: Frederick Scott
- Undead Persistence, wording of optional press
- Prev by Date: Re: Players on Cards
- Next by Date: Re: Tournament in Berkeley 5/31
- Previous by thread: Re: Undead Persistence, wording of optional press
- Next by thread: Re: Undead Persistence, wording of optional press
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|