Re: Undead Persistence, wording of optional press

<lonkka@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:528d665f-a166-4782-b847-d4ce26014cab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jun 2, 6:52 am, "Frederick Scott" <nos...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Could somebody please fix the wording on this card? :-P

the card is extremely powerful as it is even with "just" the one
optional press.

You misunderstand. I wasn't arguing to reinsert the clause I already
thought was in it (and had been used against me that way a number
of times). I was arguing to drop the near meaningless and hard-to-
express exception to the end of combat because it can easily be
confused for that clause. Basically, if that clause doesn't turn
Undead Persistence into superior Conquer the Beast, then let's get
rid of the clause altogether so no OTHER gaming groups accidentally
turn inferior Undead Persistence into superior Conquer the Beast (because
they're ignorant and mostly because they'd NEVER SUSPECT IN A MILLION
YEARS that people would waste any ink on such a nit :-P ).

Fred


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Undead Persistence, wording of optional press
    ... confused for that clause. ... Undead Persistence into superior Conquer the Beast, ... that Meat Hook has been fixed to grant a press only once per combat. ... As I said, read by itself, the card is just not that confusing. ...
    (rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad)
  • Re: Undead Persistence, wording of optional press
    ... if that clause doesn't turn ... Undead Persistence into superior Conquer the Beast, ... just isn't that confusing. ...
    (rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad)
  • Re: Undead Persistence, wording of optional press
    ... if that clause doesn't turn ... Undead Persistence into superior Conquer the Beast, ... It tends to surprise people to have so much ...
    (rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad)
  • Re: Problems when using TOP statement
    ... When I added an ORDER BY clause the times became 2 seconds when using TOP 30 ... > no reason to keep it that way), I see little point in arguing about what ... > happens here or troubleshooting it... ... > (Reverse address to reply.) ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming)
  • Re: Problems when using TOP statement
    ... Since the query is useless and meaningless without the ORDER BY clause (e.g. ... no reason to keep it that way), I see little point in arguing about what ... happens here or troubleshooting it... ... (Reverse address to reply.) ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming)