Re: Which pisses you off more, Imbued or PTO?
- From: Daneel <daniel@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 21:44:16 +0200
On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 13:38:45 -0700, librarian <auctions@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Some folks were discussing the Imbued. Part of their discussion was one person saying "Imbued don't bother me as much as PTO", and the other saying "PTO doesn't bother me as much as the Imbued".
So which pisses you off more:
PTO
Imbued
?
And of course there is the third option, "neither pisses me off much", which is the camp I fall into.
How about you?
I'm all for hating PTO. It's #1 on my hate list anytime because it can
kill your game in a way that you have no way to interact with the
process (barring special defences).
As for Imbued, as much as they are alien to the Vampire concept for me,
I'm far less disappointed by them from a gameplay point of view than
the Gehenna events that enable Imbued decks to drown normal vampire
decks.
The third thing that bugs me about the game is not tied to a specific
card but rather the constant strengthening of a deck concept - walls,
especially the weenie kind. IMHO they kill the game.
--
Regards,
Daneel
.
- References:
- Which pisses you off more, Imbued or PTO?
- From: librarian
- Which pisses you off more, Imbued or PTO?
- Prev by Date: Re: Tournement Report: ECQ Hungary 2007
- Next by Date: How would you play this?
- Previous by thread: Re: Which pisses you off more, Imbued or PTO?
- Next by thread: Re: Which pisses you off more, Imbued or PTO?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
