Re: Madness Network + Rotschreck is too good!
- From: "Alias" <ransom.stark@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 16 Mar 2006 02:32:52 -0800
Ector wrote:
James Coupe wrote:
In message <1142422770.769757.216860@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,I just explained that: Alias obviously didn't try to "help me" or
Ector <Ector@xxxxxxx> writes:
jibbajibba wrote:
Just a general point why can't you guys discuss stuff without getting
personal?
I find it quite annoying.
YES!!! That's the #1 question I always unable to answer at this
newsgroup.
Well then, let's start with you.
Why did you post personal attacks in <http://groups.google.com/group/rec
.games.trading-cards.jyhad/msg/9db12cadc20e9cd0>?
participate in the discussion. He just wanted me to shut up.
But yes, you're right, I should just ignore his post. I'm really sorry
for being out of temper and I will try to avoid writing such responses
in future.
Yours,
Ector
Ector,
yes, I was personal - by the definition: judging a person on the basis
of their previous posts. In your case, as a whining, trolling, "cry
wolf", overconfident person, who thinks that his sole experience is
valid and relevant enough to be applied globally, by making errata to
cards he doesnt like.
Yes, it is personal, its my prejudice and its not fair.
Anyway, honestly I DID read all your posts carefully and DID try to
give you advice. But this 100+ posts useless thread unfortunately
proves my former opinion, that it is wasted time. Again, you werent
able to convince a SINGLE person, you didnt *ever* admit your mistake,
and you are again using your typical style of so called "polymorphic
argumenting". you say something, someone says you are wrong, you dont
defend your original arguments, but instead polymorph them into
something completely else, somebody says you are wrong again, you
polymorph again..first its Anneke vs. Zoe, then its small vampires vs.
large vampires, then me vs. you :)) etc etc.
I wonder how you can ever ask for politedness with such an attitude.
you were given a whole load of reasonable and polite advice from a lot
of different people. But you dont listen. That is rude in MY opinion.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Madness Network + Rotschreck is too good!
- From: Ector
- Re: Madness Network + Rotschreck is too good!
- References:
- Madness Network + Rotschreck is too good!
- From: Ector
- Re: Madness Network + Rotschreck is too good!
- From: pdb6
- Re: Madness Network + Rotschreck is too good!
- From: Ector
- Re: Madness Network + Rotschreck is too good!
- From: pdb6
- Re: Madness Network + Rotschreck is too good!
- From: Ector
- Re: Madness Network + Rotschreck is too good!
- From: Robert Scythe
- Re: Madness Network + Rotschreck is too good!
- From: Ector
- Re: Madness Network + Rotschreck is too good!
- From: Janne Hägglund
- Re: Madness Network + Rotschreck is too good!
- From: jibbajibba
- Re: Madness Network + Rotschreck is too good!
- From: Ector
- Re: Madness Network + Rotschreck is too good!
- From: James Coupe
- Re: Madness Network + Rotschreck is too good!
- From: Ector
- Madness Network + Rotschreck is too good!
- Prev by Date: Re: Need deck building help with Genina, The Red Poet
- Next by Date: Re: Ector-Killer
- Previous by thread: Re: Madness Network + Rotschreck is too good!
- Next by thread: Re: Madness Network + Rotschreck is too good!
- Index(es):