Re: Try UndoHack!

On 19 Dec 2005 06:07:36 -0800, Targ.Collective@xxxxxxxxx Gave us:

>Anger? No, I pity you.
>
>You posted a joke which you meant no harm by; fair enough. But you then
>went about demolishing the image you were trying to build (that of a
>jester) by typing in CAPITALS that we're supposed to GET the JOKE...

Christ, now you are going to analyse the way my response was typed.
Hell, you got it wrong the first time, Chucko.

>If
>this is how you react to reasoned debate, then I have good cause to
>pity you.

You presented NO reasoned debate. You inferred that I posted a link
to a malignant, damaging executable. It was half witted, and I called
you on it. You don't really want to get serious. I can analyse what
you did much more deeply.

Did I need to use my Ren voice and say "You EEEDIOT" with a smiley
afterward for you to get it?

>Here's my advice. Apologise for being trollish, which you should accept
>as the prevalent opinion here

Two posters? You're trolling now, netcop boy.

> - when so many are judging you and coming
>to that conclusion

Oh yeah, it is soo, soooo many. TWO, dingledorf!

> the only reason for you to disagree is an out of
>kilter view of what a 'troll' is - and all will be forgiven,

Dude... get over it. PERIOD. You're had.

> so long as
>you don't pull another stunt like this on us anytime soon.

How old are you? If you are numerically an adult, you sure don't
sport an adult mentality. I don't need your petty thrashing, boy.

Your assessment is unsolicited, unqualified, unprofessional, and
uncool. The worst part is that you are trying to make me out as a
troll, when YOU are the one that jacking off at the mouth.

> By stunt, by
>the way, I mean your demeanor rather than your joke.

You deserved every word you got, and you continue to be deserving of
everything being said to you.

> You seem to lack
>the faculty to understand others will become hostile when this stuff is
>thrown at them in such a fashion.

You mean the way I did when you called me a fool, and tried to
accuse me of posting some malignant executable?

> Prove you have this faculty.

Dude, I do NOT need your unqualified, bull*** psych evaluation.
You got that?

> Become a
>valued member of the community.

Don't have to live up to your lame value assessments EITHER, BOY.
Now you ARE making me mad.

> Join us!

I don't have to even ask, you dopey retard. I was posting in this
group years ago, dig?

> Just remember that the
>community has the same expectations of others as you have.

Go look in a mirror, assessment boy.

> Surely you
>can't read your own posts, imagining they're someone else's, without
>thinking there's some self-opinionated idiot on the post button?

Set up several mirrors around you!

> You
>know better and I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt on that score,
>which is more that a lot of people would.

Your assessment is inconsequential. You need to get that through
your adolescent acting head. You control NOTHING. You assess NOTHING
(at least not correctly).

>Oh, and it might be 'hat' where you're from, but the 'I'll get me coat'
>line has been a classic on the Emerald Isle since time immemorial. It's
>a more poignant image, too.

You are certainly fashioning an image of yourself. You need to step
back... again.
>
>Best wishes,

More bull***.
>
>The Collective

OMG, you even top posted your utter CRAP, and quoted the entire
text! This ain't e-mail, idiot.

Do you know ANYTHING about Usenet? I am surprised that you aren't
posting with Outhouse Unexpressive! Get a clue. It was a joke. If
you didn't get it, that is YOUR problem. Hell, ain't it?

Learn how to refrain from top posting... AND netcopping folks, and
it is YOU that might garner a modicum of respect.
.