Re: not a 7drl
- From: Ray Dillinger <bear@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 10:21:22 -0700
perdurabo93@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
And no, I'm not going to make the build process any more IDE-friendly,
because any IDE whose build system is less capable than make should be
indented six feet down and covered with dirt.
I'm not aware of any *modern* IDEs who build system are *less*
powerful than make. In fact, my experience has been the opposite -
*modern* IDEs are much more powerful than make could ever be.
I dunno. Make has access to the command line, which allows to do
pretty much anything on a Unix system.
My makefile uses the output of 'grep' filtered through command-line
'sed' scripts to autogenerate a bunch of code before and while building.
I don't know of any IDE tool that can do something like that.
The crucial thing to remember is, the makefile is also source code.
It should be at the foundation of any porting effort, just like any
other file of source code.
The generated C and H files? They're not source code in the same
way; they're just a transient build artifact.
Bear
.
- References:
- not a 7drl
- From: Martin Read
- Re: not a 7drl
- From: perdurabo93@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- not a 7drl
- Prev by Date: Re: Not a 7DRL: Because It's There
- Next by Date: Re: not a 7drl
- Previous by thread: Re: not a 7drl
- Next by thread: Re: not a 7drl
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading