Re: Implementing a robust message log
- From: Elsairon <elsairon@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 03:54:57 +0000 (UTC)
On 2008-01-08 01:05:58, jice <jice.nospam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 8 jan, 00:29, Elsairon wrote:
On 2008-01-07 21:47:59, jice wrote:
It will surely make
the code more complex, but it improves nothing. Keep your current
system, it's the simplest, the more flexible.
<snip>
With the simpler system, you don't have to bother, you can put
variables inside the string with the Java + concatenation operator.
Some French guy with a big brain said one day : "Perfection is not
when there is nothing to add, but when there is nothing to remove."
I like this, very concise and clear.
Yeah, too bad it's rarely applied in the computer world ;)
--
jice
My habit of painstakingly finding difficult solutions to non-existant
problems is probably the thing that slows down my development
the most. :p
--
Elsairon
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Implementing a robust message log
- From: Krice
- Re: Implementing a robust message log
- References:
- Implementing a robust message log
- From: Elsairon
- Re: Implementing a robust message log
- From: jice
- Re: Implementing a robust message log
- From: Elsairon
- Re: Implementing a robust message log
- From: jice
- Implementing a robust message log
- Prev by Date: Re: Implementing a robust message log
- Next by Date: D. Gervais tiles released under Creative Commons
- Previous by thread: Re: Implementing a robust message log
- Next by thread: Re: Implementing a robust message log
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|