Re: What's up with LOS?
- From: Ray Dillinger <bear@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 02:42:36 -0700
Jude H wrote:
Ray Dillinger <bear@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Just to clarify: I wasn't meaning to indicate that recursive
shadowcasting is the be-all and end-all of LOS, just that I don't
forsee any need to replace the underlying LOS algorithm in my own
project.
Yah, I was mostly posting a "me too" about having my needs met
by my current LOS algm, not being partisan about which one it is.
This also means that a monster standing in any
square that the player has ever seen, can just check the eight
squares next to it for more recently seen squares and squares seen
from a shorter distance and make a local decision in constant time
about how to chase and follow the player.
I had not considered the AI implications. Thankyou! :)
Uh-oh... warning: If you're introducing autochase to an existing
game you will need to rebalance. A lot. That said, you're welcome.
Bear
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: What's up with LOS?
- From: Jude H
- Re: What's up with LOS?
- References:
- What's up with LOS?
- From: John Doe
- Re: What's up with LOS?
- From: Jude H
- Re: What's up with LOS?
- From: Ray Dillinger
- Re: What's up with LOS?
- From: Jude H
- What's up with LOS?
- Prev by Date: Re: Swords are annoying
- Next by Date: Re: Swords are annoying
- Previous by thread: Re: What's up with LOS?
- Next by thread: Re: What's up with LOS?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|