Re: Swords are annoying
- From: "Igor D. WonderLlama" <WonderLlama_@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 27 Apr 2007 13:05:59 -0700
On Apr 27, 2:16 pm, Norbert Melzer <norbert.mel...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Am 27 Apr 2007 09:48:17 -0700 schrieb Igor D. WonderLlama:Indirect fire from an arrow or thrown weapon would be examples of the
On Apr 26, 7:28 pm, Brendan Guild <d...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
- Attacking through enemies or through walls to hit a monster on theNot sure if you mean skipping over the intervening monster or hitting
other side
both. But both are useful possibilities.
This sounds for me as it only make sense with spears or other kind of long,
piercing weapons, so i would prefer your second interpretetion.
other case. Also an attack that teleports or phases might. I can't
remember the game, but there's a character in a fighting game whose
fists go through a portal to attack people without passing through the
space between.
But yeah, the first one is probably more generally useful.
.
- References:
- Swords are annoying
- From: Antoine
- Re: Swords are annoying
- From: Corremn
- Re: Swords are annoying
- From: Brendan Guild
- Re: Swords are annoying
- From: Igor D. WonderLlama
- Re: Swords are annoying
- From: Norbert Melzer
- Swords are annoying
- Prev by Date: Re: Crash Course to Roguelike Development
- Next by Date: Re: Crash Course to Roguelike Development
- Previous by thread: Re: Swords are annoying
- Next by thread: Re: Swords are annoying
- Index(es):