Re: Nid Rumors, Round 2
- From: Playa <johnpaulpontiff@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 20:21:59 -0800 (PST)
Hey,
On Nov 15, 2:03 am, "Doctor Rock" <mala...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
what depresses me, beyond even the myopic inanity characterising so much of
the recent rules material, is actually the standard of writing.
Give him his due: Alessio did okay with the v5 "Rule" Book.
It reflects years of lurking the 40k sites taking notes.
But, don't get me started on the Codecies . . .
i DO expect
'professional' writers to be able to manage basic shit like grammar
Ref Orkish "speech" and the Tau "alphabet".
If only that energy had been harnessed for Good!
tense and (grrrr) selective use of
A swirling melee? A mewling spawn? :- P
more specific to their line of work, i expect to be entertained
Good luck with that [looks at BL stable], outsourcing doesn't much
help.
Evidently, all we're going to get is what's "good enough for the
paymaster".
Imo, a single competent EDITOR would cure studio output of a world of
ills.
However, entertainment is still the job of the content creator.
Going with the lowest bidder isn't working out very well.
I mean for us - the bean counters are probably tickled.
Fwiw, I've seen you and Phil pull better out of a hat.
Playa
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Nid Rumors, Round 2
- From: Graham Thurlwell
- Re: Nid Rumors, Round 2
- From: Doctor Rock
- Re: Nid Rumors, Round 2
- References:
- [40k] Nid Rumors, Round 2
- From: Playa
- Re: Nid Rumors, Round 2
- From: Phil Bowles
- Re: Nid Rumors, Round 2
- From: Graham Thurlwell
- Re: Nid Rumors, Round 2
- From: Phil Bowles
- Re: Nid Rumors, Round 2
- From: Playa
- Re: Nid Rumors, Round 2
- From: Doctor Rock
- [40k] Nid Rumors, Round 2
- Prev by Date: Re: Incoming! Beastmen
- Next by Date: Re: Nid Rumors, Round 2
- Previous by thread: Re: Nid Rumors, Round 2
- Next by thread: Re: Nid Rumors, Round 2
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|