Re: [OT]Outtakes for March 2006


"Jim M" <hnjcomics@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:MPG.1e9c20aa33314d1798a6fe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <m4j332lutqmntlasdo9jvm8m3bcr0bnt42@xxxxxxx>,
erks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx says...
On Tue, 04 Apr 2006 00:23:42 GMT, Jim M <hnjcomics@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

In article <9rq232593hrtavvitcbdlebq593c3qe080@xxxxxxx>,
erks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx says...
On Sun, 2 Apr 2006 19:44:26 -0500, "Berto" <Albertocarro@xxxxxxx>
wrote:


"Myrmidon" <ImNot@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:MPG.1e99fc54e5a0520298a7bd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <9e3032hr3v90pbu0n3ufphq7tre0g5aut4@xxxxxxx>, Erik
Setzer,
erks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Varfed out the following in Timo speak...
On Sat, 1 Apr 2006 11:28:16 -0600, "Berto" <Albertocarro@xxxxxxx>
wrote:

Outtakes for March 2006 were a little better. There was a flurry
of them
just at the end. Speaking of flurries, I just read that Fat Bloke
and GW
has
decided to drop US prices by 50%. Of course the UK prices will
increase
slightly at 35%. Gav will start a new magazine to go along more
with the
new
SQUAT line coming out in September.... And today is September the
first...
Well, here they be:

If 40K were a produce section, the Organic section would be very
small
indeed.

and I greet him with, "Is that a servo-arm in your pocket, or are
you
just happy to see me?"
... the answer was? :)

w00+! I'm in there twice.

Shouldn't that read "w00+! I'm in there twice *AND* not in a bad
way."?

AND of course, not in a bad way. Welcome to the 2006 Outtakes in a
big way,
kind way, Erik.

Berto

Great! Now if only I could have retroactively gotten this one added
in back at the end of 2003:

"How exciting and original! It has SKULLS!"

It's still not very funny...

Not out of context, which used to be - and should still be - the
standard for the Outtakes. I think that's why it missed out, and

I didn't think it was funny even in context...
--
I always like the above saying about a "standard". I think I joined this NG
because of no standard. I liked about what Groucho Marx said once. most
clubs have "standards" that would have never let me in anyway. This is why I
like this group. But Jim, you are too old. Nothing is ever funny to you. At
least, they would believe me when I say that it is not even funny in
context...

Berto


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: [OT]Outtakes for March 2006
    ... standard for the Outtakes. ... I didn't think it was funny even in context... ... plain stupid, that is, unfortunately what is being printed. ...
    (rec.games.miniatures.warhammer)
  • Re: [OT]Outtakes for March 2006
    ... standard for the Outtakes. ... I didn't think it was funny even in context... ... But Jim, you are too old. ...
    (rec.games.miniatures.warhammer)
  • Re: [OT]Outtakes for March 2006
    ... standard for the Outtakes. ... I didn't think it was funny even in context... ... I also ignore Eldar and Tau threads as they ...
    (rec.games.miniatures.warhammer)
  • Re: Imus is a jerk
    ... You have every right to decide for yourself what's funny, just, or in good ... The word "standard" is the key. ... The Constitution guarantees the Right to Free Speech. ... "You're absolutely right," I answered, In his free time after dodging the ...
    (alt.sports.baseball.ny-mets)
  • Re: [OT]Outtakes for March 2006
    ... standard for the Outtakes. ... I didn't think it was funny even in context... ... That's because, ironically, RGMW has become too on-topic and hasn't ... and as a result has lost a fair amount of its humor. ...
    (rec.games.miniatures.warhammer)