Re: Warmachine
- From: "Craig Little" <craig.little@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 19:25:24 -0400
"Robert Williams" <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:df4nv1$amk$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "Craig Little" <craig.little@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:7-GdncjwmendQ4neRVn-gw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> "Scott McDaniel" <smcdaniel1@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:Ju2Re.61673$Ji4.39594@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> <spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>> news:1125352561.836465.179080@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Huh? Infantry units have been around since Prime. They were always part
>>>> of Warmachine and always intended to be. They add much needed
>>>> flexibility to the game and round out the wargaming experience. It's
>>>> still clear that the Warjacks and casters are still the centerpieces.
>>>> The latest supplement only emphasizes that, being that the only units
>>>> featured are 'jacks and casters.
>>>>
>>>
>>> <SNIP>
>>>
>>> Holy freakin' fanboy from Hell.
>> It's not quite Rob Williams Forgeworld level.
>
> LOL, I wondered how long it would take some original and really witty
> person to mention me.
>
I don't know. It's been a day or so, and so far no original or witty person
has mentioned you. Just my tired and busted ol' ass.
.
- Prev by Date: Re: [40K] Eldar Question: # of Wraithlords
- Next by Date: Re: Warmachine
- Previous by thread: Re: Warmachine
- Next by thread: Re: Warmachine
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
