Re: Origin of Mahjong : Invented or Evolved?
- From: al <alee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 10:36:34 -0700 (PDT)
On Apr 12, 5:11 pm, al <a...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Apr 2, 8:31 am, al <a...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Mah-Jong invented or evolved?
On Mar 1, 1:57 pm, al <a...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 12, 7:54 pm, al <a...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:> On Jan 12, 4:16 am, Jon Schild <j...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
al wrote:
T.S.On Dec 14 2007, 11:07 am, "Tom Sloper"
<tslo...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"al" <a...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
[..]But first let me remind you my question is "Origin of Mahjong Invented or Evolved?"
al:That's a classic two-choices question. The problem with two-choices
questions is that they're almost always fallacious.
Not always.
[..[[..] It was in
ancient divination [practice], "go or no-go", equivalent
to flipping a [shell] (even before coins were available).
al:
al:KINGS AND COMMONERS GOT [answers] FROM DIVINATION practice.[..]
SIMPLER [the answer], THE BETTER...[..]
Yet, I have not seen a good argument that defends the hypothesis thatI can’t help but wonder what scholars and historians of mahjong are up
to these days. Discussion on the subject is dead.
MJ is from evolution.
Some people accepted the evolution idea without having actually read
the source document on Ma Diao. That is my impression from other
related discussion.
From 40 to 30 cards. That is hypothesized.strings; from myriad to ten-thousand; all are over-simplified..
From Taiji diagrams and guo (fruits) to Cash; from trigrams to
al:
[..]
al:Westerners still tend to be ignorant of Chinese culture and tradition.
They failed to grasp the simple idea that symbol is everything or
everything is symbol. Mahjong game is no exception.[..]
This is why.PUT IT SIMPLY, Those concentrib] ROUND CIRCLEs are SYMBOL, NOT CASH. That is, they are conceptual, not material objects.
When a language, like the Chinese, was based on symbols and pictures,
the words are also symbols and pictures. Then Chinese thinking is also
in symbols and pictures. Take the word, 東 (east) for example, it shows
a sun 日 coming up and shining through a tree 木. Note that wood 木 is
symbol for the whole tree, 樹. Both ‘sun’ and ‘wood’ are only abstracts
of the real objects. That is emphatically clear. 日 and 木 are not the
real objects. They are symbols. Furthermore, symbols can be metaphors
which have different connotative meanings.
I can not explain why sunset in the west does not have the same
writing. The sun shines through trees on its way "down" as well.
al:
al:[..] A coin can mean more than
just a coin; it could symbolize wealth. Just as a tree can mean more
than just a tree; it could symbolize health, growth or prosperity.
[Therefore] MAHJONG SYMBOLS ARE NOT "MONEY-SUITED"
al:Westerners (scholars and historians) like Glover, Himley, Culin and
Wilkinson, made the same mistake [when they took their elementary lessons from unqualified teachers. They got hold of a round symbol and
cast it as “cash”, a real object; then multiplied the mistake by
extrapolating another symbol 萬 or 万 to mean a quantity of finite
specific value. Those Westerners ignored or were ignorant of the fact
that 萬 or 万 has figuratively “ten thousand” meanings. Convinced of
their scientific deduction, they concluded that the third symbol must
be also quantitative and settled on an interpretation of one of the
multiple definitions of (suo3) [..] as a “string of cash”.
[..]
It would be impossible to string hole-less coins.THE MAHJONG CIRCLES DON'T EVEN HAVE SQUARE HOLES!!!
[..]al:
In a geocentric universe, those concentric circles are more like
planetary orbits. At least that would link the winds/directions with
cosmological aspects of Taoism.
al:
Gin rummy is a much later game.SINCE NO OTHER GAME HAS THE UNIQUE FEATURES OF PATTERN FORMING GAME-
PLAY AND THREE-CARD SUBGROUPING, MAHJONG IS MORE THAN QUALIFIED AS AN
INVENTION.
None whatsoever.JUST THINK. WHAT OTHER GAME HAS A PAIR OF "EYES" IN IT?
al:
Look at the taiji diagram of yin-yang. The two round balls are like
the pupils of a pair of eyes. There is another possible link between
Mah-Jong and I-Ching.
++++++++++
Cheers....al
.
- Prev by Date: Mah Jong FAQs
- Next by Date: Re: New Article
- Previous by thread: Mah Jong FAQs
- Next by thread: Re: New Article
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|