Re: The Big Tease
- From: Harry Sigerson <harrysigerson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 13:06:35 GMT
Bantari,
IGS owns it - in the sense that they designed it, developed it, andThat's very reasonable.
named it. Its only just for us to use the name its designers wish us to
use.
I don't suppose IGS would be troubled if it got feedback suggesting
a change of name or indeed any aspect of the application; most
programmer/designers want feedback on everything to do with their work.
Such feedback would best be by email, not per a usenet group.
Of course the feeder-back might feel that such a single and private
emailed suggestion would not be read, that sent into the body of a
newsgroup it would have more import. His feeling might be completely
wrong on that score. On the other hand he may get a private email reply
even if it is only an acknowledgement of receipt.
At that juncture the developer could in his turn post the emailer's
suggestion into a newsgroup; seeking reaction from the probably
interested user/public.
I've been hoping that what initials, GSCP, stand for would appear in
rgg <s>. I'm guessing it's something along the lines...
Go Sxxxxx Cxxxx Protocol
Harry.
Harry.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Big Tease
- From: Harry Sigerson
- Re: The Big Tease
- From: henricbergsaker
- Re: The Big Tease
- References:
- The Big Tease
- From: Big Duck
- Re: The Big Tease
- From: Harry Sigerson
- Re: The Big Tease
- From: Michael Alford
- Re: The Big Tease
- From: Bantari
- Re: The Big Tease
- From: Michael Alford
- Re: The Big Tease
- From: Bantari
- Re: The Big Tease
- From: Michael Alford
- Re: The Big Tease
- From: henricbergsaker
- Re: The Big Tease
- From: Michael Alford
- Re: The Big Tease
- From: henricbergsaker
- Re: The Big Tease
- From: Michael Alford
- Re: The Big Tease
- From: Bantari
- The Big Tease
- Prev by Date: Re: The Big Tease
- Next by Date: Re: The Big Tease
- Previous by thread: Re: The Big Tease
- Next by thread: Re: The Big Tease
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|