Re: Old news but still worth noting: Computers rule chess
- From: "Frank de Groot" <franciad@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 14:10:34 +0100
"Xiaoding" <xiaoding2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
> Oh please, get real. What is the raw performance of the human brain,
> anyways? Which computer now comes close? Silly.
My computer can do millions of calculations per second.
I don't know how many floating point multiplications your brain can do per
second, but I doublt it's more than a couple :)
It all depends what you want a computer to do, and how it's programmed,
wether or not it is superior to the human brain or not-
> I contend computers can beat humans at Go now, there has just been no
> serious effort.
It appears that your postulation is that computers have the neccessary
processing power, but the software does not take advantage of it, right?
In that case, I agree. I thing that current computers would be able to play
at pro level in Go, if only the software would exist.
Making that software, however, is a whole different ballgame.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Old news but still worth noting: Computers rule chess
- From: Hans-Georg Michna
- Re: Old news but still worth noting: Computers rule chess
- References:
- Re: Old news but still worth noting: Computers rule chess
- From: Xiaoding
- Re: Old news but still worth noting: Computers rule chess
- Prev by Date: Re: Using GoR as seeding rather than rank
- Next by Date: Re: Using GoR as seeding rather than rank
- Previous by thread: Re: Old news but still worth noting: Computers rule chess
- Next by thread: Re: Old news but still worth noting: Computers rule chess
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|