Re: Proofs about Pass Fights (1)
- From: Robert Jasiek <jasiek@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 20:46:11 +0100
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 11:11:47 -0700, Patrick Bridges
<bridges@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> The number of relevant discussing people is smaller or much smaller.
>Is it?
Yes.
>If you set up a mailing list devoted to such rules
It was done.
>the singla
>might be slightly lower because one or two marginally interested
>people didn't partake,
That is too many relative to a small total number of specialists.
>but, judging from this and past discussions,
>the noise might be *much* lower, allowing for a much higher
>signal/noise ratio.
Noise is immaterial, what counts is factual discussion.
>If your document is not aimed at all, which is clear both its style
>and content and by what you've said to Chris, then why are you
>attempting to reach all with it?
I am attempting to reach all THAT ARE INTERESTED in such.
>Why not post it to a list of only
>interested parties so that the relevant discussion can happen
Because not all interested read such a list; the percentage is greater
for RGG.
>instead
>of pretty pointless side discussions like you and Chris L. have been
>having?
Reaching more interested people is more important than avoiding
not-so-on-topic critics.
--
robert jasiek
.
- References:
- Re: Proofs about Pass Fights (1)
- From: Chris Lawrence
- Re: Proofs about Pass Fights (1)
- From: Robert Jasiek
- Re: Proofs about Pass Fights (1)
- From: Chris Lawrence
- Re: Proofs about Pass Fights (1)
- From: Simon Goss
- Re: Proofs about Pass Fights (1)
- From: T Mark Hall
- Re: Proofs about Pass Fights (1)
- From: Robert Jasiek
- Re: Proofs about Pass Fights (1)
- From: Patrick Bridges
- Re: Proofs about Pass Fights (1)
- From: Robert Jasiek
- Re: Proofs about Pass Fights (1)
- From: Patrick Bridges
- Re: Proofs about Pass Fights (1)
- From: Robert Jasiek
- Re: Proofs about Pass Fights (1)
- From: Patrick Bridges
- Re: Proofs about Pass Fights (1)
- Prev by Date: Re: AGA lies!
- Next by Date: Re: AGA lies!
- Previous by thread: Re: Proofs about Pass Fights (1)
- Next by thread: Re: Proofs about Pass Fights (1)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|