Re: bayesian spam filter plays Go??

On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 09:40:15 -0500, grikdog
<unlikely@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>This article in re training a Bayesian spam filter
It's stupid.
Basically the person is trying to use the same technique
( basically applying Bayes Theorem ). If the person was
smart they would take a Go p[rogram and incorporate
Bayes Theorem, instead of going through the contortions
( not to mention wasted computer time ) of making a spam filter play.


The reply-to email address is olczyk2002@xxxxxxxxxx
This is an address I ignore.
To reply via email, remove 2002 and change yahoo to
interaccess,

**
Thaddeus L. Olczyk, PhD

There is a difference between
*thinking* you know something,
and *knowing* you know something.
.