Re: "Generic" magic
- From: Bruce Grubb <bgrubb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 08:29:13 -0600
In article <1156946350.314732.107650@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"copeab@xxxxxxxxx" <copeab@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
bgrubb@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Same piss poor attitude and responce to reasoned arguments as over in
rec.games.frp.dnd with regards to alignment. Should we be suprised? Not
really.
Ah, good, I see I don't need to bother replying to you anymore, either.
I will hold that to EVERY and ANY post I make in the future in ANY newgroup.
.
- References:
- Re: "Generic" magic (was: Re: A cornucopia of magic systems)
- From: copeab@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: "Generic" magic
- From: raven
- Re: "Generic" magic
- From: bgrubb@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: "Generic" magic
- From: copeab@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: "Generic" magic
- From: Bent C Dalager
- Re: "Generic" magic
- From: copeab@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: "Generic" magic
- From: Bruce Grubb
- Re: "Generic" magic
- From: copeab@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: "Generic" magic
- From: David Johnston
- Re: "Generic" magic
- From: copeab@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: "Generic" magic
- From: bgrubb@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: "Generic" magic
- From: copeab@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: "Generic" magic (was: Re: A cornucopia of magic systems)
- Prev by Date: Re: "Generic" magic
- Next by Date: Re: Size Modifier and Basic Move
- Previous by thread: Re: "Generic" magic
- Next by thread: Re: "Generic" magic
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|