rec.games.frp.dnd

• Thread Index

---

• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Ubiquitous
• Re: Posting stats, rgfd. 2012 May
  • From: Ubiquitous
• Re: 3.5 reprint!
  • From: Ubiquitous
• Re: 3.5 reprint!
  • From: Ubiquitous
• Re: 3.5 reprint!
  • From: Ubiquitous
• Re: 3.5 reprint!
  • From: Ubiquitous
• Re: 3.5 reprint!
  • From: Ubiquitous
• Re: 3.5 reprint!
  • From: Nicole Massey
• Re: why have buff spells?
  • From: tussock
• Re: 3.5 reprint!
  • From: tussock
• Re: 3.5 reprint!
  • From: Nicole Massey
• Re: 3.5 reprint!
  • From: Hadsil
• Re: 3.5 reprint!
  • From: Anonymous Jack
• Re: 3.5 reprint!
  • From: D . J .
• Re: 3.5 reprint!
  • From: Alcore
• Re: 3.5 reprint!
  • From: Nicole Massey
• Re: 3.5 reprint!
  • From: drow
• Re: 3.5 reprint!
  • From: Tetsubo
• 3.5 reprint!
  • From: Justisaur
• Re: why have buff spells?
  • From: Harold Groot
• The Video Poker Information
  • From: onlinedashcasinosdotcom
• The Video Poker Information
  • From: onlinedashcasinosdotcom
• Re: why have buff spells?
  • From: Rast
• Re: Oh, I get it now, Fighters /should/ have spells.
  • From: Ken Arromdee
• Re: Oh, I get it now, Fighters /should/ have spells.
  • From: Nicole Massey
• Re: Oh, I get it now, Fighters /should/ have spells.
  • From: Harold Groot
• Re: Oh, I get it now, Fighters /should/ have spells.
  • From: D . J .
• Re: Oh, I get it now, Fighters /should/ have spells.
  • From: Harold Groot
• Re: Oh, I get it now, Fighters /should/ have spells.
  • From: Justisaur
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Ken Arromdee
• Re: Oh, I get it now, Fighters /should/ have spells.
  • From: Ken Arromdee
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Alcore
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Tetsubo
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Tetsubo
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)
• The Keno Information
  • From: onlinedashcasinosdotcom
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: tussock
• Re: Oh, I get it now, Fighters /should/ have spells.
  • From: tussock
• Re: Oh, I get it now, Fighters /should/ have spells.
  • From: tussock
• Re: Oh, I get it now, Fighters /should/ have spells.
  • From: tussock
• Re: Oh, I get it now, Fighters /should/ have spells.
  • From: drow
• Re: Oh, I get it now, Fighters /should/ have spells.
  • From: tussock
• Re: Oh, I get it now, Fighters /should/ have spells.
  • From: D . J .
• Re: Oh, I get it now, Fighters /should/ have spells.
  • From: D . J .
• Re: Oh, I get it now, Fighters /should/ have spells.
  • From: Loren Pechtel
• Re: Oh, I get it now, Fighters /should/ have spells.
  • From: drow
• Re: Oh, I get it now, Fighters /should/ have spells.
  • From: drow
• Re: Oh, I get it now, Fighters /should/ have spells.
  • From: Jim Davies
• Re: Oh, I get it now, Fighters /should/ have spells.
  • From: Harold Groot
• Re: Oh, I get it now, Fighters /should/ have spells.
  • From: Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)
• Re: Oh, I get it now, Fighters /should/ have spells.
  • From: D . J .
• Re: Oh, I get it now, Fighters /should/ have spells.
  • From: Jim Davies
• Re: Oh, I get it now, Fighters /should/ have spells.
  • From: D . J .
• Re: Oh, I get it now, Fighters /should/ have spells.
  • From: Harold Groot
• Re: Oh, I get it now, Fighters /should/ have spells.
  • From: drow
• Re: Oh, I get it now, Fighters /should/ have spells.
  • From: Ken Arromdee
• Re: Oh, I get it now, Fighters /should/ have spells.
  • From: D . J .
• Re: Oh, I get it now, Fighters /should/ have spells.
  • From: Ken Arromdee
• Re: Oh, I get it now, Fighters /should/ have spells.
  • From: Justisaur
• Re: Oh, I get it now, Fighters /should/ have spells.
  • From: Keith Davies
• Re: Oh, I get it now, Fighters /should/ have spells.
  • From: Keith Davies
• Re: Oh, I get it now, Fighters /should/ have spells.
  • From: Harold Groot
• Re: Oh, I get it now, Fighters /should/ have spells.
  • From: Jim Davies
• Re: DnD Next Playtest.rar: initial impressions.
  • From: Jim Davies
• Re: Oh, I get it now, Fighters /should/ have spells.
  • From: Nicole Massey
• Re: Oh, I get it now, Fighters /should/ have spells.
  • From: Nicole Massey
• Re: Oh, I get it now, Fighters /should/ have spells.
  • From: Jim Davies
• The Blackjack Information by online casinos
  • From: onlinedashcasinosdotcom
• Re: Oh, I get it now, Fighters /should/ have spells.
  • From: Ken Arromdee
• Re: Oh, I get it now, Fighters /should/ have spells.
  • From: Harold Groot
• Re: why have buff spells?
  • From: Hadsil
• Re: Oh, I get it now, Fighters /should/ have spells.
  • From: Nicole Massey
• Re: why have buff spells?
  • From: Keith Davies
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Keith Davies
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Keith Davies
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Keith Davies
• Re: Oh, I get it now, Fighters /should/ have spells.
  • From: Keith Davies
• Re: Oh, I get it now, Fighters /should/ have spells.
  • From: Keith Davies
• Re: Oh, I get it now, Fighters /should/ have spells.
  • From: Keith Davies
• Re: Oh, I get it now, Fighters /should/ have spells.
  • From: Keith Davies
• Re: Oh, I get it now, Fighters /should/ have spells.
  • From: Keith Davies
• Re: Oh, I get it now, Fighters /should/ have spells.
  • From: Grant Anderson
• Re: Oh, I get it now, Fighters /should/ have spells.
  • From: Nicole Massey
• Re: Oh, I get it now, Fighters /should/ have spells.
  • From: Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)
• Re: Oh, I get it now, Fighters /should/ have spells.
  • From: David Lamb
• Re: Oh, I get it now, Fighters /should/ have spells.
  • From: David Lamb
• Re: why have buff spells?
  • From: David Lamb
• Re: why have buff spells?
  • From: Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)
• Re: why have buff spells?
  • From: Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)
• Re: why have buff spells?
  • From: Tetsubo
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Tetsubo
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Rast
• Re: why have buff spells?
  • From: Loren Pechtel
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Nicole Massey
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Rast
• Re: why have buff spells?
  • From: Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: David Lamb
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Loren Pechtel
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Loren Pechtel
• Re: why have buff spells?
  • From: Loren Pechtel
• Re: why have buff spells?
  • From: Justisaur
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Justisaur
• Re: why have buff spells?
  • From: El Rico D
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: David Lamb
• Re: why have buff spells?
  • From: D . J .
• Re: why have buff spells?
  • From: Tetsubo
• Re: why have buff spells?
  • From: Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)
• Re: why have buff spells?
  • From: Justisaur
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Nicole Massey
• Re: Oh, I get it now, Fighters /should/ have spells.
  • From: Nicole Massey
• Re: why have buff spells?
  • From: David Lamb
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: David Lamb
• Re: why have buff spells?
  • From: Tetsubo
• Baby girl hair accessories
  • From: Cheeky Bambinos
• Re: PF - Raven Familiar stats?
  • From: tussock
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: tussock
• Re: Oh, I get it now, Fighters /should/ have spells.
  • From: tussock
• Re: PF - Raven Familiar stats?
  • From: Rick Pikul
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Rick Pikul
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Loren Pechtel
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Ken Arromdee
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Ken Arromdee
• Re: what at-wills should spellcasters have
  • From: Jim Davies
• Re: why have buff spells?
  • From: Joanna Rowland Stuart
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Shawn Wilson
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Shawn Wilson
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Shawn Wilson
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Loren Pechtel
• Re: Oh, I get it now, Fighters /should/ have spells.
  • From: David Lamb
• Re: Oh, I get it now, Fighters /should/ have spells.
  • From: Nicole Massey
• Re: Oh, I get it now, Fighters /should/ have spells.
  • From: David Lamb
• Re: Oh, I get it now, Fighters /should/ have spells.
  • From: David Lamb
• Re: Oh, I get it now, Fighters /should/ have spells.
  • From: David Lamb
• Re: Oh, I get it now, Fighters /should/ have spells.
  • From: tussock
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: drow
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Nicole Massey
• Re: Oh, I get it now, Fighters /should/ have spells.
  • From: Alcore
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Shawn Wilson
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Shawn Wilson
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Shawn Wilson
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Nicole Massey
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: David Lamb
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: tussock
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Tetsubo
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Paul Colquhoun
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Tetsubo
• Oh, I get it now, Fighters /should/ have spells.
  • From: tussock
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: tussock
• Re: Posting stats, rgfd. 2012 May
  • From: Justisaur
• PF - Raven Familiar stats?
  • From: Harold Groot
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Nicole Massey
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Tetsubo
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: David Lamb
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Tetsubo
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Alcore
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Nicole Massey
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Tetsubo
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: tussock
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: drow
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Loren Pechtel
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Tetsubo
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Nicole Massey
• Cheap Flights to Austria
  • From: Gillian
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Magewolf
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Nicole Massey
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Nicole Massey
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Tetsubo
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Tetsubo
• Re: what at-wills should spellcasters have
  • From: Harold Groot
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: tussock
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: tussock
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: tussock
• Re: what at-wills should spellcasters have
  • From: tussock
• Re: Posting stats, rgfd. 2012 May
  • From: drow
• Re: Posting stats, rgfd. 2012 May
  • From: Ubiquitous
• Re: Posting stats, rgfd. 2012 May
  • From: Ubiquitous
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Rast
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Nicole Massey
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Tetsubo
• Re: 5e/next from the DM chair
  • From: Nicole Massey
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Tetsubo
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Justisaur
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Nicole Massey
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Nicole Massey
• Re: 5e/next from the DM chair
  • From: David Lamb
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: David Lamb
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Rast
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Nicole Massey
• Re: what at-wills should spellcasters have
  • From: tussock
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Tetsubo
• Re: 5e/next from the DM chair
  • From: David Trimboli
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: David Trimboli
• Re: Posting stats, rgfd. 2012 May
  • From: Tetsubo
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Tetsubo
• Re: Posting stats, rgfd. 2012 May
  • From: tussock
• Re: Posting stats, rgfd. 2012 May
  • From: David Lamb
• Re: Posting stats, rgfd. 2012 May
  • From: Rast
• Re: 5e/next from the DM chair
  • From: tussock
• Re: Posting stats, rgfd. 2012 May
  • From: drow
• Re: Posting stats, rgfd. 2012 May
  • From: David Lamb
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: David Lamb
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: drow
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: drow
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: drow
• Re: Posting stats, rgfd. 2012 May
  • From: Ubiquitous
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: David Trimboli
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: David Trimboli
• Re: Posting stats, rgfd. 2012 May
  • From: Tetsubo
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Magewolf
• Re: Posting stats, rgfd. 2012 May
  • From: tussock
• Re: what at-wills should spellcasters have
  • From: Magewolf
• Re: what at-wills should spellcasters have
  • From: Nicole Massey
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Nicole Massey
• Re: Posting stats, rgfd. 2012 May
  • From: Justisaur
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: drow
• Re: what at-wills should spellcasters have
  • From: Keith Davies
• Re: Posting stats, rgfd. 2012 May
  • From: Rast
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Rast
• Re: 5e/next from the DM chair
  • From: David Lamb
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: David Lamb
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Tetsubo
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Tetsubo
• Re: 5e/next from the DM chair
  • From: tussock
• Re: what at-wills should spellcasters have
  • From: tussock
• Re: Posting stats, rgfd. 2012 May
  • From: tussock
• Re: Posting stats, rgfd. 2012 May
  • From: drow
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: David Trimboli
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Justisaur
• Re: Posting stats, rgfd. 2012 May
  • From: Justisaur
• Re: what at-wills should spellcasters have
  • From: Gordon Burditt
• Re: what at-wills should spellcasters have
  • From: Ken Arromdee
• Re: what at-wills should spellcasters have
  • From: Keith Davies
• Re: what at-wills should spellcasters have
  • From: David Lamb
• Re: what at-wills should spellcasters have
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: what at-wills should spellcasters have
  • From: Keith Davies
• Re: Posting stats, rgfd. 2012 May
  • From: Keith Davies
• Re: what at-wills should spellcasters have
  • From: Alcore
• Re: what at-wills should spellcasters have
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: what at-wills should spellcasters have
  • From: tussock
• Re: what at-wills should spellcasters have
  • From: tussock
• Re: after discussing about jesus
  • From: tussock
• 5e/next from the DM chair
  • From: drow
• Re: what at-wills should spellcasters have
  • From: drow
• Re: DnD Next Playtest.rar: initial impressions.
  • From: drow
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Nicole Massey
• Re: DnD Next Playtest.rar: initial impressions.
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: DnD Next Playtest.rar: initial impressions.
  • From: Rast
• Re: why have buff spells?
  • From: Rast
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Tetsubo
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Alcore
• after discussing about jesus
  • From: me
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Tetsubo
• Posting stats, rgfd. 2012 May
  • From: tussock
• Re: why have buff spells?
  • From: tussock
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: tussock
• Re: why have buff spells?
  • From: Harold Groot
• Re: DnD Next Playtest.rar: initial impressions.
  • From: tussock
• Re: DnD Next Playtest.rar: initial impressions.
  • From: tussock
• Re: what at-wills should spellcasters have
  • From: tussock
• Re: why have buff spells?
  • From: tussock
• Re: why have buff spells?
  • From: David Lamb
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: D . J .
• Re: DnD Next Playtest.rar: initial impressions.
  • From: Tetsubo
• Re: what at-wills should spellcasters have
  • From: Hadsil
• Re: DnD Next Playtest.rar: initial impressions.
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: what at-wills should spellcasters have
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: why have buff spells?
  • From: Harold Groot
• Re: why have buff spells?
  • From: David Trimboli
• Re: so, uh, here's a thing....
  • From: Joanna Rowland Stuart
• why have buff spells?
  • From: David Lamb
• Re: what at-wills should spellcasters have
  • From: David Lamb
• Re: what at-wills should spellcasters have
  • From: drow
• Re: what at-wills should spellcasters have
  • From: tussock
• Re: what at-wills should spellcasters have
  • From: Harold Groot
• Re: what at-wills should spellcasters have
  • From: Loren Pechtel
• Re: DnD Next Playtest.rar: initial impressions.
  • From: Rast
• Re: what at-wills should spellcasters have
  • From: Harold Groot
• Re: what at-wills should spellcasters have
  • From: Loren Pechtel
• Re: what at-wills should spellcasters have
  • From: Harold Groot
• Re: what at-wills should spellcasters have
  • From: Tetsubo
• Re: what at-wills should spellcasters have
  • From: David Lamb
• Re: what at-wills should spellcasters have
  • From: Keith Davies
• Re: what at-wills should spellcasters have
  • From: Loren Pechtel
• Re: what at-wills should spellcasters have
  • From: Justisaur
• Re: what at-wills should spellcasters have
  • From: Alcore
• Re: what at-wills should spellcasters have
  • From: David Lamb
• Re: what at-wills should spellcasters have
  • From: drow
• what at-wills should spellcasters have
  • From: David Lamb
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Geoffrey White
• Re: DnD Next Playtest.rar: initial impressions.
  • From: Rast
• Re: DnD Next Playtest.rar: initial impressions.
  • From: Rast
• Re: DnD Next Playtest.rar: initial impressions.
  • From: Rast
• Re: DnD Next Playtest.rar: initial impressions.
  • From: drow
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: tussock
• Re: DnD Next Playtest.rar: initial impressions.
  • From: tussock
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: tussock
• Re: DnD Next Playtest.rar: initial impressions.
  • From: Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Rast
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Tetsubo
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Rast
• Re: DnD Next Playtest.rar: initial impressions.
  • From: Rast
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Tetsubo
• Re: 5e open playtest
  • From: Ubiquitous

• Security
• UNIX
• Linux
• Coding
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint

newsgroups.derkeiler.com  > Archive  > Rec  > rec.games.frp.dnd  > 2012-06