Re: |[IRL] Didn't we already win this fight?
- From: "Stanley Rexwinkle" <hahntsak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 09:15:12 -0800
"Justin" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:slrngj6fh0.no.nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Stanley Rexwinkle wrote on [Sun, 30 Nov 2008 09:35:10 -0800]:the rest will remain. they are the total in the end. what becomes of those removed is irrelevant. they don't matter anymore. they can be forgotten as they should be.
"Shawn" <shawn520@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:CNrYk.1211$yK5.64@xxxxxxxxxxx
"Stanley Rexwinkle" <hahntsak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:CaVXk.5215$8_3.3275@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"David Klassen" <klassen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1d6fee37-8bb2-49a1-9d87-446aa878e4d6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Nov 27, 8:48 pm, "Stanley Rexwinkle" <hahnt...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
those that can home school should not be forced to subsidize
babystitting
services of those that simply don't give a damned anymore and just want
somebody to watch their kids during the day 9 months a year. that is
what
public school really has become anymore.
A) Not all public schools are "babysitting"; with proper funding, and
with proper social programs for support, the worst of them can be
made to work just as well as the best of them.
again the only social programs offered by public schools are the jail
model and not worthy of money. private schools and home schooling are
better options.
B) Not all poor parents are neglectful parents (gee, class
stereotyping, anyone?!).
the parents that have more than one child they can't afford are
neglectful. one kid is chance, the rest are a matter of parents that just
don't care.
C) Yes, they should be forced to pay. If they decide to opt out,
bully for them, but they don't get a refund. The education of ALL
children and youth is the responsibility of everyone.
then why are they so bound and determined to make kids attend their
school? funding is based on attendance. if half the kids suddenly opt for
home schooling they lose a lot of funding. And we are not our brother's
keeper despite what some socialists would have us believe.
Well, you don't have to be your brother's keeper, or give a damn about Joe
Blow out on the street, but the problem is, ignoring problems tends to
only make them worse. 'It's not my problem' is a common refrain of those
who think something isn't their problem only to have that little problem
bite them on the nose.
if you get rid of them by exiling to a penal colony offshore, then you can
forget about them easily. we don't have to care for those we hate. if they
wrong us and fall on there own, then we have no reason to help them out. let
them perish on their own. they don't need us to save them to do us in later.
they will not suddenly be our friend, but rather regard us as fools we are
for helping them.
Let me ask you something. If you exile all these people you are opposed
to, since that is MOST people, how many people will be left?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: |[IRL] Didn't we already win this fight?
- From: Kyle Wilson
- Re: |[IRL] Didn't we already win this fight?
- References:
- Re: |[IRL] Didn't we already win this fight?
- From: Justin
- Re: |[IRL] Didn't we already win this fight?
- Prev by Date: Re: |[IRL] Didn't we already win this fight?
- Next by Date: Re: |[IRL] Didn't we already win this fight?
- Previous by thread: Re: |[IRL] Didn't we already win this fight?
- Next by thread: Re: |[IRL] Didn't we already win this fight?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading