Re: Who did not bother to switch to 4E, and why?
- From: Loren Pechtel <lorenpechtel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2008 10:02:29 -0700
On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 14:44:12 +0200, LL <Lorenz.Lang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
A pharmacist has a duty to provide medicines prescribed by a doctor.
No choice for him?
How revealing.
No choice.
He may refuse to fill it if he thinks something's faked about it or if
it conflicts with something else the patient is taking. Otherwise, he
follows the doctor's orders to the letter. There is no leeway.
A couple of months ago I ran into this. The doc miswrote the script,
the substance listed in it isn't available. The pharmacist knew
exactly what it should say but he couldn't provide it, he had to
contact the doc and get it reissued. The problem was the doc listed
the desired substance and omitted the fact that it comes with a methyl
group attached.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: Who did not bother to switch to 4E, and why?
- From: Kyle Wilson
- Re: Who did not bother to switch to 4E, and why?
- From: LL
- Re: Who did not bother to switch to 4E, and why?
- From: David Klassen
- Re: Who did not bother to switch to 4E, and why?
- From: Tetsubo
- Re: Who did not bother to switch to 4E, and why?
- From: copeab@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Who did not bother to switch to 4E, and why?
- From: Tetsubo
- Re: Who did not bother to switch to 4E, and why?
- From: copeab@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Who did not bother to switch to 4E, and why?
- From: Tetsubo
- Re: Who did not bother to switch to 4E, and why?
- From: LL
- Re: Who did not bother to switch to 4E, and why?
- Prev by Date: Re: Who did not bother to switch to 4E, and why?
- Next by Date: Re: Who did not bother to switch to 4E, and why?
- Previous by thread: Re: Who did not bother to switch to 4E, and why?
- Next by thread: Re: Who did not bother to switch to 4E, and why?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
