Re: 4E leak mentioned in Forbes
- From: Hong Ooi <hong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 21:46:52 +1000
Parvati V wrote:
Nel tempo Sat, 31 May 2008 01:23:00 -0700, il mio fedele schiavo Wu
desto' nel mio animo interesse sopra il conversare di My Conscience
<thatdarnsocknipping@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
Odd that the person who grabbed them took so long to spread them, and that this is a week before the actual release.
I thought so too. This "leak" is so timely. It may be a coincidence of
course...
I, for one, am glad it happened. It has no effect on my purchase of
the books (as I had already preordered them a couple months ago), but
I am bad at waiting and I'm glad I can read the real thing now.
Scott Rouse (WotC PR manager) says it's a leak.
http://www.enworld.org/showpost.php?p=4259218&postcount=37
Of course, he would say so, but he also says that the leaked MM is based on the wrong file and contains errors and material that didn't make it to the final cut.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 4E leak mentioned in Forbes
- From: Rick Pikul
- Re: 4E leak mentioned in Forbes
- References:
- 4E leak mentioned in Forbes
- From: Hong Ooi
- Re: 4E leak mentioned in Forbes
- From: My Conscience
- Re: 4E leak mentioned in Forbes
- From: Parvati V
- 4E leak mentioned in Forbes
- Prev by Date: Re: Ampersand: The Scoop on D&D Insider
- Next by Date: Re: Ampersand: The Scoop on D&D Insider
- Previous by thread: Re: 4E leak mentioned in Forbes
- Next by thread: Re: 4E leak mentioned in Forbes
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
