Re: Torture - A lawful good act?
- From: Terry Austin <terry.notaniceperson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2007 04:25:51 -0000
John <jsphillips1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in news:640cd30b-72be-46dd-bbcc-
b4e62844c25f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
On Dec 4, 4:56 pm, No 33 Secretary <terry.notaniceper...@xxxxxxxxx>Oh, certainly, Shawn is entertaining. In a "taunt the kitten with a laser
wrote:
John <jsphilli...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in news:1a6b57e1-a522-4d6a-b18f-
26bdc0bb5...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
John wrote
Shawn Wilson wrote:
Matt Frisch wrote:
Except for, you know, people who actually know what they're
talking about...
I mean, Vincent Bugliosi agrees with me...
Quote please.
Yeah, good luck on that.
You never know, he has pretended to answer questions before.
Yeah, but never in such a way that you can actually verify them.
Which is what makes it entertaining.
pointer because it's too dumb to figure it out" sort of way.
--
Terry Austin
Beware the other head of science. It bites.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Torture - A lawful good act?
- From: Blackheart
- Re: Torture - A lawful good act?
- References:
- Re: Torture - A lawful good act?
- From: Shawn Wilson
- Re: Torture - A lawful good act?
- From: Matt Frisch
- Re: Torture - A lawful good act?
- From: Shawn Wilson
- Re: Torture - A lawful good act?
- From: John
- Re: Torture - A lawful good act?
- From: No 33 Secretary
- Re: Torture - A lawful good act?
- From: John
- Re: Torture - A lawful good act?
- From: No 33 Secretary
- Re: Torture - A lawful good act?
- From: John
- Re: Torture - A lawful good act?
- Prev by Date: Re: Torture - A lawful good act?
- Next by Date: Re: Torture - A lawful good act?
- Previous by thread: Re: Torture - A lawful good act?
- Next by thread: Re: Torture - A lawful good act?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|