Re: Torture - A lawful good act?
- From: Matt Frisch <matuse73@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2007 03:47:54 GMT
On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 14:16:11 -0800 (PST), Shawn Wilson
<ikonoqlast@xxxxxxxxx> scribed into the ether:
On Dec 4, 2:26 am, Matt Frisch <matus...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 14:22:30 -0800 (PST), Shawn Wilson
<ikonoql...@xxxxxxxxx> scribed into the ether:
On Nov 29, 12:29 pm, No 33 Secretary <terry.notaniceper...@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
You STILL haven't realized that Cochrane never showed that one
single bit of evidence or relevant testimony was false.
He didn't need to.
Because people like you are just that gullible...
Shawn, as in all things, you're wrong and nobody agrees with you. Nobody
has ever agreed with you on any subject during the entire course of your
life.
Except for, you know, people who actually know what they're talking
about...
Nobody has ever agreed with you about anything, ever, in the history of
your life.
Making claims that people agree with you is not people agreeing with you.
We've been over this before. You're a complete kook who nobody takes
seriously.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Torture - A lawful good act?
- From: No 33 Secretary
- Re: Torture - A lawful good act?
- References:
- Re: Torture - A lawful good act?
- From: Shawn Wilson
- Re: Torture - A lawful good act?
- From: Matt Frisch
- Re: Torture - A lawful good act?
- From: Shawn Wilson
- Re: Torture - A lawful good act?
- Prev by Date: Re: Torture - A lawful good act?
- Next by Date: Re: Torture - A lawful good act?
- Previous by thread: Re: Torture - A lawful good act?
- Next by thread: Re: Torture - A lawful good act?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading