Re: Torture - A lawful good act?
- From: Matt Frisch <matuse73@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2007 23:44:48 -0800
On Sun, 2 Dec 2007 16:29:21 -0800 (PST), veritas <khogantwo@xxxxxxxxx>
scribed into the ether:
On Dec 2, 3:40 pm, Matt Frisch <matus...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, 1 Dec 2007 22:48:11 -0800 (PST), veritas <khogan...@xxxxxxxxx>
scribed into the ether:
On Dec 1, 10:05 pm, Matt Frisch <matus...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Sat, 1 Dec 2007 12:47:02 -0800 (PST), veritas <khogan...@xxxxxxxxx>
scribed into the ether:
On Dec 1, 12:31 am, Matt Frisch <matus...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>Logical fallacies you've commited in this post:
wrote:
Ad Hominem
Appeal To Fear
Appeal to Spite
Appeal to Consequence of Belief
Biased Sample
Division
Guilt By Association
Hasty Generalization
Special Pleading
Two Wrongs Make A Right
You're a veritable treasure trove of idiocy, invalid arguements, and closed
minded bigotry.- Hide quoted text -
I would like to point out to you that you are the one who has
committed all the above on this post.
Really? When was that?
Still waiting.
You don't even know the meaning of those terms.
I have done none of the above.
Really? How do you know, when you don't know what any of those terms mean?
You've still demonstrated no knowledge of what any of the above terms
means.
And I would point to your closing statement as proof that you
are the guilty party, not I.
By all means, tell me how any portion of my post conforms to even one of
them.
I triple dog dare you. Hypocrite.
There are people today that are
fighting, some dying to try to protect your lifestyle. So that you
can live your life in the fashion you are used to living it.
That's what you're missing though...they're not. They are dying to appease
a stupid and feeble old man, much like yourself, who sends children out to
die to no purpose. Then he has the nerve to insult the people who don't
want their children sent to die. Also much like you.
(One of them was a rodeo clown, he kept the
bulls off you, a brave boy.
Cause lord knows that without rodeo clowns, the streets would run red with
the blood of other people cut down in the prime of life by
rampaging...bulls. Are you seriously trying to portray a RODEO CLOWN as
some kind of majestic hero? Please tell me you're not, cause that's just
ludicrous.
They died for
nothing but their honor.
Oh, I thought they were dying to keep me in my "rich" lifestyle. Can you
even stick to your own points? No, I suppose not, since you've spent many
posts trying to backpedal your original statements about killing all
muslims.
I assure you, they are few
when I am serious. We rock and roll on here sometimes, but if you
want a debate, bring it.
There has been precisely and exactly ZERO evidence of this. You can't even
edit a post, and I'm supposed to believe that you can come up with a cogent
arguement? Go ahead, prove me wrong.
I already dared you at the top to find a single instance of me using any of
the above (when you accused me of using all of them), and you singularly
failed to do that. From this, I'm supposed to believe that you have TEH MAD
DEBATOR SKILLZ? Ha.
Ha.
Ha.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Torture - A lawful good act?
- From: veritas
- Re: Torture - A lawful good act?
- References:
- Re: Torture - A lawful good act?
- From: veritas
- Re: Torture - A lawful good act?
- From: Matt Frisch
- Re: Torture - A lawful good act?
- From: veritas
- Re: Torture - A lawful good act?
- From: Matt Frisch
- Re: Torture - A lawful good act?
- From: veritas
- Re: Torture - A lawful good act?
- From: Matt Frisch
- Re: Torture - A lawful good act?
- From: veritas
- Re: Torture - A lawful good act?
- Prev by Date: Re: Torture - A lawful good act?
- Next by Date: Re: Torture - A lawful good act?
- Previous by thread: Re: Torture - A lawful good act?
- Next by thread: Re: Torture - A lawful good act?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|