Re: Torture - A lawful good act?

Shawn Wilson <ikonoqlast@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:35b05db9-a32c-4708-9e45-54f2f4d3a727@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
com:

On Nov 28, 7:09 pm, Terry Austin
<terry.notaniceper...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Then why were they charged with perjury?

Politics.

Yeah, that must be it. Because as we all know, there are no
racists anywhere in the world, and cops are genetically
incapable of being corrupt.


And the manipulation goes on.

Pity you're not very good at it, eh, 'tard-boy?

OJ definitely got his money's
worth...

You STILL haven't realized that Cochrane never showed that one
single bit of evidence or relevant testimony was false.

He didn't need to. The defense has no responsibility to prove
anything. If you weren't retarded, you'd know that. By catching two
cops red-handed, lying under oath, he brought their credibility in
to question - reasonable doubt. Since *every* piece of evidence was
tainted by their perjury - which *they* agreed was perjury - there
was nothing left.

He painted you a paranoid picture and you filled in the blanks
yourself.

Paranoia is, by defenition, unreasonable. There was nothing
unreasonable about telling the jury that two cops were willing to
lie under oath to convict the defendant, since they were caught red
handed.

You, on the other hand, are clearly retarded.



That, or you're fucking stupid.


Well, one of us is...

Indeed. One, and only one of us is retarded. That one is you.



As police
detectives - both very experienced - they would certainly
know how the system works. Are you saying that the system is
so profoundly corrupt that two experienced cops with the
backing of their union (and the union's lawyers - who would
certainly be representing them, if they looked _at all_
innocent) can't hope for a fair trial?

Fair doesn't mean free.

It does if you are innocent.


No, it doesn't.

So, in Shawnworld, it's fair to imprison an innocent man? What a
retard.


Except two cops pleading guilty to perjury, to avoid real
prison time if they were convicted.

That is not evidence that the cops framed anyone.

Yeah, actually, it is. It's an *admission* they did.



No, it isn't.

Well, technically, it's only an admission they *tried* to frame
him, since they failed. But for it to be perjury - which they
admitted it was - it had to be relevant to the case, and intended
to sway the outcome with willful untruth. Ergo, they did, in fact,
admit to trying to frame him.

I suppose you're retarded enough to think that one must be innocent
to be framed. Well, "think" wouldn't be the right word, of course,
since you're too fucking stupid to be able to think.

You might as well claim it is an admission that
they think they are ham sandwichs.

You might as well admit you're a retard.



OJs defense team
STILL has you tied up in knots.

Or you're still a drooling retard.


OJ was guilty.

Irrelevant, since he was found not guilty.

The evidence plainly showed he was guilty.

The evidence shown to the jury was plainly tainted by perjury.
Every. Single. Piece.

The
cops handled the investigation they way they were supposed to.

Once again, you claim that cops are *supposed* to lie under oath.
What a fucked up world you must live in. Fortunately, it's not the
world the rest of us live in.

But you think, based on the statements of someone who is PAID to
manipulate people's beliefs in a specific way, that they did
something wrong in their investigation.

Furhman and van Atter were PAID to plead guilty to perjury? Who
paid them? How much? What evidence do you have?

Why, exactly, do you take what Johnney Cochrane said in a trial
as a defense attorney at face value? Hell, he had both a moral
and a legal obligation to do exactly what he did.

Why do you continue to pretend that two cops - who handled every
single piece of evidence presented to the jury - did not *admit* to
perjury? Is it mental retardation, or are you actually mentally
ill?

Have you even noticed that he has you tied up in knots,
distrusting the evidence that they raised without ever actually
challenging any part of that evidence?

Ya'll are new around here, aren't you?

He led you down the garden path and you followed like a sucker.

And you're a retard. Nothing new about that.

--
Terry Austin

"There's no law west of the internet."
- Nick Stump
.