Re: Off-Topic -- Gender Discrimination
- From: No 33 Secretary <terry.notaniceperson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:34:10 -0000
"Malachias Invictus" <invictusebay@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:VMmdnX7Fl-fGW_PbnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx:
Then you should be able to cite the specific section and paragraph
"Terry Austin" <terry.notaniceperson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Xns9948CEB7F18A8taustingmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Discrimination based on race is expressly prohibited in federal
civil rights law. Discrimination based on sex isn't.
...other than in the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Equal Pay
Act of 1963. You are dead wrong, bub. Sex has been a Protected
Class as long as race has been, right along with religion,
"color," and national origin.
of the US Code to back that up.
If you were correct, there would be millions of lawsuits over it,
all the time, as the pay difference between men and women doing the
same jobs is well documented.
But we both know you're - as usual - full of ***.
--
"What is the first law?"
"To Protect."
"And the second?"
"Ourselves."
Terry Austin
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Off-Topic -- Gender Discrimination
- From: Malachias Invictus
- Re: Off-Topic -- Gender Discrimination
- From: Shawn Wilson
- Re: Off-Topic -- Gender Discrimination
- From: Werebat
- Re: Off-Topic -- Gender Discrimination
- References:
- Off-Topic -- Gender Discrimination
- From: Werebat
- Re: Off-Topic -- Gender Discrimination
- From: Terry Austin
- Re: Off-Topic -- Gender Discrimination
- From: Malachias Invictus
- Off-Topic -- Gender Discrimination
- Prev by Date: Re: OotS 464
- Next by Date: Re: Off-Topic -- Gender Discrimination
- Previous by thread: Re: Off-Topic -- Gender Discrimination
- Next by thread: Re: Off-Topic -- Gender Discrimination
- Index(es):