Re: Miser's Envy -- trouble?
- From: Jasin Zujovic <jzujovic@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 17:21:32 +0200
In article <mnDSe.7671$Cc5.3732@lakeread06>, ronpoirier@xxxxxxx says...
> >>I don't think I'd ban Miser's Envy, it's just that I can see it
> >>leading to arguments because I'll have to adjudicate all the time.
> >
> > Most of the Charm-type spells have that, though. Look at Suggestion: "The
> > suggestion must be worded in such a manner as to make the activity sound
> > reasonable." Does Jasin Zujovic's Suggestion example sound reasonable as a
> > course of action? Possibly, but you can bet the players involved are going
> > to strongly argue "NO!"
>
> Point taken.
IMO, the clauses about "reasonable", "against your nature" &c. should
only come into play in the most extreme circumstances.
After all, the example of a "reasonable" suggestion is "that's not acid,
it's water, have a nice refreshing swim".
Same thing goes for dominate. Allowing too much argument about what
"against your nature" could lead to dominate having two saves,
absolutely every time: in the extreme, you could argue that anyting
anyone commands you to do is against your nature, since otherwise you'd
be doing it on your own.
--
Jasin Zujovic
jzujovic@xxxxxxx
.
- References:
- Miser's Envy -- trouble?
- From: Werebat
- Re: Miser's Envy -- trouble?
- From: Jasin Zujovic
- Re: Miser's Envy -- trouble?
- From: Werebat
- Re: Miser's Envy -- trouble?
- From: Mark Blunden
- Re: Miser's Envy -- trouble?
- From: Werebat
- Miser's Envy -- trouble?
- Prev by Date: Re: Miser's Envy -- trouble?
- Next by Date: Re: Poison Dusk Lizardfolk?
- Previous by thread: Re: Miser's Envy -- trouble?
- Next by thread: Re: Miser's Envy -- trouble?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|