Re: Warlock Character Build, Advice Sought
- From: Kaos <kaos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 16:24:31 -0600
On Sun, 31 Jul 2005 22:47:59 -0400, Shawn Roske
<shawn_roske@xxxxxxxxxxxx> dared speak in front of ME:
>Will Green wrote:
>> Shawn Roske wrote:
>>> Will Green wrote:
>>>> Shawn Roske wrote:
>>>>> This alignment view is more /neutral/ than chaotic neutral. Chaotic
>>>>> neutral would see people as getting what they deserve, they most
>>>>> certainly would knowingly harm an innocent if they had any notion to
>>>>> do so, and loyalty is to themselves over anyone else. A neutral
>>>>> person would also knowingly harm an innocent, they just are unlikely
>>>>> to ever benefit from it. Only the good avoid knowingly harming
>>>>> innocents.
>>>> RTFM.
>>> I stand by my interpretation.
>> Even though it's very, very wrong? Can you cite anything from the SRD
>> or PHB to support your "interpretation?"
>
>The bit about not harming an innocent seems more towards good than
>neutral, so I suggested dropping the chaotic element. Since he needs
>the chaos for the class, perhaps drop the consideration of innocence
>altogether.
>
>The paragraph, beginning "People who are neutral..." bottom of 104p. PH
>depicts a person or group of people who would knowlingly send innocents
>to die if they were not in the in-group.
No it doesn't. It depicts a person or group thereof who won't stop
someone else from doing as you describe.
>Add chaos to neutral with the coresponding rebellion from authority and
>the emphasis on individualism,
And you get someone who's... not going to get involved without a
personal interest either way. (And if his interest leads towards
doing harm to said 'innocent,' then it becomes questionable whether
said person is truly innocent.)
>Harming the innocent does not
>always occur through malice, and most often occurs through not giving a
>damn.
You are confusing "allows harm to come to innocents" with "knowingly
causes harm to innocents."
--
Address no longer works.
try removing all numbers from
gafgirl1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDemon.com<<<<<<------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access
.
- References:
- Warlock Character Build, Advice Sought
- From: Tetsubo
- Re: Warlock Character Build, Advice Sought
- From: Shawn Roske
- Re: Warlock Character Build, Advice Sought
- From: Will Green
- Re: Warlock Character Build, Advice Sought
- From: Shawn Roske
- Re: Warlock Character Build, Advice Sought
- From: Will Green
- Re: Warlock Character Build, Advice Sought
- From: Shawn Roske
- Warlock Character Build, Advice Sought
- Prev by Date: Re: Hydras are CR4?!? WTF?!?
- Next by Date: Re: Contacting the Sage
- Previous by thread: Re: Alignments again was Re: Warlock Character Build, Advice Sought
- Next by thread: Re: Warlock Character Build, Advice Sought
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|