Re: Evovlers and fitness functions.
- From: terrestris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 07:16:06 -0700
Hi Cristian
On Sep 11, 3:01 pm, Cristian210273 <cristian210...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
In this case, the max fitness a warrior could obtain should
be:
(30*3)*100+(30*3)*100=18000
Using this fitness, I obtain warriors that gain about the 52%
of the total score.
Equivalent to a hill score of 156, sounds fine. Your opponents
will get < 48% of the total score on average.
Running more battles would reduce the score noise.
Do you think that the fitness I use is wrong? Or should I search
for the problem elsewhere (in the evolution algorithm or in the
benchmark warriors I use)? If the problem is in the fitness
function, can you suggest me a more suitable algorithm?
Have you tried submitting anything to the nano hill yet?
Cheers,
sf
--
http://sfghoul.blogspot.com / http://corewar.atspace.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Evovlers and fitness functions.
- From: Cristian210273
- Re: Evovlers and fitness functions.
- References:
- Evovlers and fitness functions.
- From: Cristian210273
- Evovlers and fitness functions.
- Prev by Date: Evovlers and fitness functions.
- Next by Date: Re: Evovlers and fitness functions.
- Previous by thread: Evovlers and fitness functions.
- Next by thread: Re: Evovlers and fitness functions.
- Index(es):