Re: Emacs vs. Vi Debate? Vi Wins!
- From: Polychromic <macecil@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 13:29:41 -0600
On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 19:20:36 +0100, CK <claus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Words to the wise, Polychromic <macecil@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
LOL. Well, I would gloat if I cared one way or the other. It's funny to
see RMS get tired of maintaining his baby Emacs though.
Where did you get that? And besides, VI is vastly superior anyways.
I usually used vi or vim to get things configured, then used some
graphical notepad or ultraedit editor once I got Xfree86 installed.
Anyhow, I got that from /. a few days ago.
http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/02/23/1313229&from=rss
--
The Polychromic Dragon of the -=={UDIC}==-
Webpage http://macecil.googlepages.com/index.htm
RGCUD Dragon Gallery http://home.roadrunner.com/~rgcud/
Chuck Norris: Afraid of NOTHING, except John McCain's 95 year-old mother.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Emacs vs. Vi Debate? Vi Wins!
- From: Saint George's Dragon
- Re: Emacs vs. Vi Debate? Vi Wins!
- References:
- Emacs vs. Vi Debate? Vi Wins!
- From: Polychromic
- Re: Emacs vs. Vi Debate? Vi Wins!
- From: CK
- Emacs vs. Vi Debate? Vi Wins!
- Prev by Date: Re: You know it's a good game when...
- Next by Date: Eewww, ship sailing in U5L is not so good.
- Previous by thread: Re: Sorry. Was Re: Emacs vs. Vi Debate? Vi Wins!
- Next by thread: Re: Emacs vs. Vi Debate? Vi Wins!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
