Re: Looks like this was a reply day
- From: Ibn al-Hazardous <ibn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 12:55:03 GMT
mån 2006-05-29 klockan 20:54 -0700 skrev thehawk:
Polychromic wrote:
On Mon, 29 May 2006 21:38:24 GMT, Ibn al-Hazardous
<ibn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
mån 2006-05-29 klockan 17:01 -0400 skrev erimess:
On Sat, 27 May 2006 06:02:34 -0400, Helgraf DragonWe aim to please! ::))
<helgraf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
37 replies ... of course, I read almost 500 messages, so percentage wiseBetween you and Ibn that explains why suddenly I'm bringing in 50+ new
my reply ratio was pretty low. ~7.2%
messages every day. That's unusual. (Though nice to see messages
actually coming in.)
Make sure to raise the lid first.
That should be a given when aiming to please. When you are aiming to
anger, then leave the lid down.
But if we aim to peas, does that entail lid or not?
'Bon!
/Ibn
.
- References:
- Looks like this was a reply day
- From: Helgraf Dragon
- Re: Looks like this was a reply day
- From: erimess
- Re: Looks like this was a reply day
- From: Ibn al-Hazardous
- Re: Looks like this was a reply day
- From: thehawk
- Looks like this was a reply day
- Prev by Date: Re: Cluebook Conundrum
- Next by Date: Re: Spelling Bees
- Previous by thread: Re: Looks like this was a reply day
- Next by thread: Re: Looks like this was a reply day
- Index(es):