Cutting to the Chase About Polgar's Law Suit
- From: lafferty1949@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 06:01:34 -0800 (PST)
From the USCF Issues Forum. And she wants to meadiate. Can't imaginewhy.
------------------------------
by David Ames on Fri Dec 12, 2008 11:12 pm #119946
The complaint, when I found a link to it a week ago, seemed to allege
everything and specify nothing. It appeared to be a fishing
expedition, demanding that defendants supply self-incriminating
information.
I am certainly reminded of a chess organizer who, knowing that I had
correspondence with a disapproved person, demanded that I apologize
for "reliance" on that person. What I had written to that organizer
was that, although I had correspondence with <name omitted>, I
considered it more neighborly to share MY information with that
organizer. The principal clause established that I was not reliant and
the subordinate clause was faultily interpreted to mean that I was
reliant.
My point is to remark on the magisterial attitude that causes some
people to assert, in judgment, in self-importance, a right to sue for
multi-millions, a right to command personal service and obeisance, in
violation of others' rights. I hope that the resolution of this legal
matter will allow USCF to sue for malicious prosecution. Default of
judgment may perhaps establish unfitness to serve.David Ames
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2008 10:29 pm
USCFId: 10012376
Private message Top
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reply with quoteReport this post by JediJoshua on Fri Dec 12, 2008
11:20 pm #119947
The name of this post is indeed the $25 million dollar question as
none of us, as of yet, know what Polgar is talking about. As
previously stated (search many of the forum posts about this subject)
she failed to list individual complaints because (in her lawyers
words) "she hasn't found the proof yet because it is on the USCF's
servers and she needs access to the USCF servers to get the proof".
That is paraphrased a bit, but is the gist of her response to the
defendants asking for proof and specific accusations.
So it is mainly about someone throwing a tantrum and
posturing.JediJoshua
Posts: 401
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 3:25 am
Location: Southern Indiana
USCFId: 12666993
Private message Top
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reply with quoteReport this post by Mulfish on Sat Dec 13, 2008 6:26
am #119954
So you're saying she needs the court to give her a fishing license.
Polly has the right idea.
.
- Prev by Date: Death threats against cops from Marcus W. Roberts
- Next by Date: Herman Steiner designed sets
- Previous by thread: The Questions Polgar (and Hubby) Should Be Asking
- Next by thread: Herman Steiner designed sets
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
