Re: Who wants to save USCF and who does not?
- From: arodobop <arodobop@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 01:10:19 -0800 (PST)
On Jan 30, 7:51 am, Larry Tapper <larry_tap...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Blunderful view. The disrespect USCF has shown towards the game is
Anyway, my view is that if you like to play slow rated chess sitting
opposite your opponent in the traditional way, there's no reason not
to join the USCF. In this respect, it's the only game in town, and the
game is not much different from the way it's always been, the scandale
du jour notwithstanding.
Regards, Larry T.
reason enough not to throw away money better spent elsewhere. Such an
apathetic attitude is one of the reasons the USCF is such a lousy
representative for the game.
First comes apathy, then stagnation, then a cesspool of nasty filth
that no one wants to be near.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Who wants to save USCF and who does not?
- From: Ray Gordon, creator of the \"pivot\"
- Re: Who wants to save USCF and who does not?
- References:
- Who wants to save USCF and who does not?
- From: Ray Gordon, creator of the \"pivot\"
- Re: Who wants to save USCF and who does not?
- From: J.D. Walker
- Who wants to save USCF and who does not?
- Prev by Date: Will the CIA kill Kirsan Ilyumzhinov?
- Next by Date: Re: Will the CIA kill Kirsan Ilyumzhinov?
- Previous by thread: Re: Who wants to save USCF and who does not?
- Next by thread: Re: Who wants to save USCF and who does not?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
