Re: The anonymous remailer COULDN'T BE them....
- From: RufusZ <Rufus.Zee@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 15:31:49 -0800 (PST)
On Jan 29, 6:09 pm, "Ray Gordon, creator of the \"pivot\""
<r...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
How remailers work.
The author writes a letter, and includes the destination address.
Which is NOT encrypted.
If one sees that someone sent 1,276 letters to the same remailer that winds
up in 1,276 USENET posts, etc.
Every remailer I know of does NOT send matching counts due to the
reliabiliy losses inhernet in the remailer networks. Which remailer
are you aware of that does?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The anonymous remailer COULDN'T BE them....
- From: RufusZ
- Re: The anonymous remailer COULDN'T BE them....
- References:
- The anonymous remailer COULDN'T BE them....
- From: Ray Gordon, creator of the \"pivot\"
- Re: The anonymous remailer COULDN'T BE them....
- From: RufusZ
- Re: The anonymous remailer COULDN'T BE them....
- From: RufusZ
- Re: The anonymous remailer COULDN'T BE them....
- From: Ray Gordon, creator of the \"pivot\"
- The anonymous remailer COULDN'T BE them....
- Prev by Date: Re: The anonymous remailer COULDN'T BE them....
- Next by Date: Re: The anonymous remailer COULDN'T BE them....
- Previous by thread: Re: The anonymous remailer COULDN'T BE them....
- Next by thread: Re: The anonymous remailer COULDN'T BE them....
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|