Re: Susan's "Secret Evidence" Story
- From: The Historian <neil.thehistorian@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 06:21:11 -0800 (PST)
On Jan 27, 7:58 am, samsloan <samhsl...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On her blog, Susan says that she has secret "rock solid" evidence
proving that she and her husband are not guilty of 2,464 the "Fake Sam
Sloan" postings.
Unfortunately, she cannot reveal this secret evidence until the case
is over.
Here is what Susan says:
"Blogger SusanPolgar said...
"Chris, nice to see your post. I know the evidence first hand. It
was faxed to the USCF attorney. The evidence is absolutely rock solid.
Perhaps one of these days after the case is dismissed, we can make it
public for all members to see.
"Best wishes to you and your family and Happy New Year!
"Susan Polgar"
Saturday, January 26, 2008 11:55:00 PM CST
http://susanpolgar.blogspot.com/2008/01/financial-disaster-ahead.html
The 'evidence' must have really impressed the attorney. Do you think
it's 'evidence' on the order of P Innes' so-called stylistic analysis?
If so, the phrase "laugh them to scorn" comes to mind to describe
their reaction to Trolgar's faxed twaddle.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Susan's "Secret Evidence" Story
- From: J.D. Walker
- Re: Susan's "Secret Evidence" Story
- Prev by Date: Re: VIOLATION OF TERMS OF SERVICE
- Next by Date: Re: Susan's "Secret Evidence" Story
- Previous by thread: Re: Open letter to Dylan Loeb McClain (New York Times)
- Next by thread: Re: Susan's "Secret Evidence" Story
- Index(es):