Re: Text of Second Order of Protection against Polgar and Truong
- From: marcuswroberts@xxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 11:49:02 -0800 (PST)
On Dec 20, 12:32 pm, sl...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Sam Sloan) wrote:
Page 2
Docket No. V-11575-06-07C,
V-11576-06/07C
GFs 2002
[99] Observe such other condition(s) as are necessary to further the
purposes of protection: FOR: Leeam Shutzmam (DOB: 11/2000) and Tom
Shutzman(DOB: 03/06/1999) RESPONDENT MOTHER MAY NOT INTERFERE OR DENY
THE FATHER (JACK SHUTZMAN) VISITATION WITH THE SUBJECT CHILDREN AS
WRITTEN IN THE DIVORCE ORDER OR FAMILY COURT ORDER. RESPONDENT MOTHER
IS NOT TO USE CORPORAL PUNISHMENT OF ANY KIND ON THE SUBJECT CHILDREN
AND RESPONDENT MOTHER IS NOT TO LEAVE CHILDREN UNDER THE SUPERVISION
OF HER HUSBAND (PAUL) PENDING FURTHER INVESTIGATION AND INGESTION OF
HOT SAUCE IS NOT TO BE USED AS A FORM OF DISCIPLINE.;
It is further ordered that this Temporary Order Of Protection shall
remain in effect up to and including March 27, 2007;
Dated: January 11, 2007 ENTER
__________________________
Honorable Rhea G.
Friedman
The Family Court Act provides that presentation of a copy of this
order of protection to any Police officer or peace officer acting
pursuant to his or her special duties shall authorize, and in some
situations may require, such officer to arrest a person who is alleged
to have violated its terms and to bring him or her before the court to
face whatever penalties my be imposed therefore.
Federal law provides that this order must be honored and enforced by
state and tribal courts, including courts of a state, the District of
Columbia, a commonwealth, territory or possession of the United
States, if it is established that the person against whom the order is
sought has been or will be afforded reasonable notice and opportunity
to be heard in accordance with state law sufficient to protect that
person's rights (18 U.S.C. §§2265, 2266).
It is a federal offense to: cross state lines to violate an order of
protection; cross state Braes to engage in stalking, harassment or
domestic violence against an intimate partner or family member;
possess, purchase, ship, transfer or receive a handgun, rifle,
shotgun, or other firearm or ammunition following a conviction of a
domestic misdemeanor involving the use or attempted use of physical
force or a deadly weapon; or (except for military or law enforcement
officers while on duty) possess, purchase, ship, transfer or receive a
handgun, rifle, shotgun or other firearm or ammunition while an order
of protection, issued after notice and an opportunity to be heard,
that protects an intimate partner against assault, harassment,
threatening and/or stalking, remains in effect (18 U.S.C. §§922(g(8),
922(g)(9), 2261, 2261A, 2262).
PURSUANT TO SECTION 1113 OF THE FAMILY COURT ACT, AN APPEAL FROM THIS
ORDER MUST BETAKEN WITHIN 30 DAYS OF RECEIPT OF THE ORDER BY APPELLANT
1N COURT, 35 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF MAILING OF THE ORDER TO APPELLANT
TO THE CLERK OF COURT, OR 30 DAYS AFTER SERVICE BY A PARTY OR THE LAW
GUARDIAN UPON THE APPELLANT, WHICHEVER IS EARLEST.
Check applicable box:
Here are the links to the two orders of protection:
http://www.shamema.com/polgar-op-1.pdf
http://www.shamema.com/polgar-op-2.pdf
So Susan moved to Texas to be able to spank her child. This order out
of New
York will not be honored in Texas with respect to corporal
punishment.
I'll call Texas Tech and ask if Paul beats Susan's children...
Marcus Roberts
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Text of Second Order of Protection against Polgar and Truong
- From: accounts receivable
- Re: Text of Second Order of Protection against Polgar and Truong
- Prev by Date: Re: Typical Document from a nasty divorce
- Next by Date: my report
- Previous by thread: No one gives a hoot about your lawsuits, Sloan
- Next by thread: Re: Text of Second Order of Protection against Polgar and Truong
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
