Re: New evidence that Sam Sloan did in fact admit to have illicit sex with an underaged prostitute

Parr will probably make one of the following arguments:

(a) it does not prove child molestation because Sam may have invented
all the stories; or

(b) it does not prove child molestation because Sam's assessment of
the girls' ages is inherently unreliable.

In any case, it does prove that Sam wants everybody to think that he
had sex with children, which is more than sufficient reason to treat
him as a child molester.

.

Relevant Pages