Re: Beatriz saved the USCF

On 31 Aug 2005 21:56:52 -0700, "WPraeder" <wpraeder@xxxxxxx> wrote:

>politikalhack@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> The immediate context: http://tinyurl.com/bkawh
>
>Bill,
>
>Thank you. We are all used to Sam Sloan's conclusory allegations and
>disparaging remarks. The readers can conclude how often his facts may
>be correct. Everyone is entitled to an opinion but this statement is
>difficult to be construed as such. In my view his statement is clearly
>written with a reckless disregard of whether it is false or not. It is
>good for the readers to see first hand how some of those who represent
>the USCF behave and it helps me make my point that further reforms for
>USCF officials should be considered. I do ask for an apology for such a
>false statement, however it may be too much to expect. I have one year
>so for now to avoid further republication I will simply treat the
>statement with contempt.
>
>Regards,
>Wayne Praeder
>http://members.aol.com/wpraeder/culture.htm
>
Would you mind telling me exactly which statement was false?

Sam Sloan
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Beatriz saved the USCF
    ... disparaging remarks. ... The readers can conclude how often his facts may ... the USCF behave and it helps me make my point that further reforms for ... false statement, however it may be too much to expect. ...
    (rec.games.chess.politics)
  • Re: NEW PAPER RELATED TO GPS AND EARTH ROTATION PUBLISHED
    ... > understand the content or relevance of each and every post. ... > numbers of other readers are doing right now, ... Sam is *really good* at ... at any occasion that presents itself isn't my responsibility. ...
    (sci.geo.satellite-nav)
  • Re: C***
    ... >>> Did you give any thought to the lady readers on here who possibly find ... that's far more unpleasant than anything the Mullen or ASL ever came up ... SAm. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (uk.media.tv.misc)