Re: Question for Rob....
- From: "Chess One" <innes8@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 15:12:41 GMT
Rob Mitchell should be aware that people wrote abusive messages about female
members of my family after an altercation in this newsgroup with Brennen.
I simply offer this notice of a matter of fact. Should this complaint prove
insufficient I suppose I could resurrect another stalking [this time of a
woman] by Brennen from another newsgroup.
Stalking usually occurs to those who have an apparent authority and it
doesn't matter whether there is uncritically agreement with them and all
they say, or obsessive! personal abuse - the authority thing is the key.
Its an interesting specualtion: Perhaps a resolution for the stalker is to
seek self-approval rather than demand approval of others?
Should a person actually stop his constant abuse of others the self-evident
truth of what one does compared to what one says would be so much clearer.
Phil Innes
"The Historian" <Spamscone@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1124022383.453130.183830@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Rob wrote:
>>
>> This was reposted by someone in the FIDE news group. It is well said
>> and I would hope that anyone with a penchant for history would
>> recognize it's merit.
>
> Let's see how Rob would classify the following little gems, pulled from
> the newsgroup posts of Phil Innes made August 13, 2005:
>
>>
>> Harsh criticism is one thing, but gadflies have a few traits that make
>> them
>> standout
>>
>> I.) Name calling, such as: scum bags, pimps, low life scumbags,
>> crooks,
>> thieves, fools, criminals and even misanthropes.
>
> "...he is a stalker...", "...this son of a bitch...", "...people think
> he is a turd...", "...a distorter...", "He
> is true American sicko. He has previously speculated on my sex life,
> whereas
> he himself appears not to have any, and has never professed any
> interest in
> women, and even thinks that when other people talk of sex it is
> 'dirty'. Yet
> this 400+ pounder who we might imagine is no Errol Flynn, likes to
> suggest
> what other's sex lives should be." "...crank bunch of people...",
> "...compulsive public schizoid liar..."
>
>> II.) Serious accusations on criminal acts, gross mismanagement and
>> other
>> acts of malfeasance in office; made in a public forum and/or mass mail
>> outs.
>> Accusations so serious, that the more proper forum would be to file
>> complaints
>> at the State Attorney's office, or initiate the procedures to have the
>> subjects
>> of these complaints removed from office. In each of these, there would
>> be
>> investigation, a process of discovery; where the accused would have the
>> right
>> to defend himself.
>
> "...stalker...", "...continues to libel anyone
> [everone!] who has achieved more than he", "...formal legal action..."
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Question for Rob....
- From: The Historian
- Re: Question for Rob....
- References:
- Question for Phil Innes
- From: The Historian
- Re: Question for Phil Innes
- From: Mike Murray
- Re: Question for N.B
- From: Rob
- Re: Question for N.B
- From: Mike Murray
- Re: Question for N.B
- From: Rob
- Re: Question for Rob....
- From: The Historian
- Question for Phil Innes
- Prev by Date: Re: USCF's homepage
- Next by Date: Re: A play by play on the Phoenix Delegates' Meeting would be Cool:)
- Previous by thread: Re: Question for Rob....
- Next by thread: Re: Question for Rob....
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|