Re: Help-bot Busted Again (was Fischer-Spassky 1992 (Game 9) - Ruy Lopez Exchange )


"help bot" <nomorechess@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:86b62cc1-261a-476e-b3ca-e308ddab958b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Feb 13, 1:15 am, "David Kane" <davidek...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

The point is that, on this point, you are wrong from start
to finish.

Where is your proof? All I've seen is pictures
of de Nile... crocks eating wildebeasts... empty
claims that TP must not have written something
because you don't happen to like it-- that sort
of thing. Obviously, you have no proof because
it doesn't exist-- nor could it.


Sloan's ramblings are almost always wrong
on the big points, but every now and then he gets
a detail correct.

Well, he is correct that his horrible play
is classified as the Damiano's Defense--
I'll give him that.


> That's not very good pay for this sort of
> work. Tell me, are you on welfare and
> food stamps? Why do you expect others
> to work for you, gratis?

Not gratis. In return, I'll offer, a constructive
assessment of some of your mental defects, instruct
you in logic, etc.

No, I want you to work for free, like I do.

TK was generous enough to offer up some
"serious dough" to anyone who was willing to
take his "bet", but as usual, his effort got no
takers.

Look, kid: you're already a step above the
mindless Evans ratpackers by teaming up
with your new pal, TK; but you are way out
of your league here. When it comes to
logic and reason, even your fearless leader
falls short of the mark, time and again.

I respect Taylor Kingston for going to the
trouble of going through Petrosian's book
to verify that you are a liar. Personally, I don't
think you have enough credibility to warrant
any effort whatsoever. I initially discounted
the story because of the source (you) and so far am
completely vindicated in my belief that your
uncorrobated "evidence" should be ignored.

From reading him over the years, I do
suspect that TK is better versed in chess
history than I am (even though I am nowhere
near so ignorant as you), so it was reasonable
to request his opinion. However, I do not
agree with everything TK writes, a fact
you could verify if you were not lazy and
unintelligent. I will say that when it comes to
supplying facts to back of his assertions
in this newsgroup, no others come close.

Sorry, you're still busted.


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Will Rich ever learn how to properly cite a quote???Re: Jen Larson quotes.
    ... reason you changed them. ... quotes into Google and verify as copy & pasting one of your old ID's. ... to me how YOU use message IDs to verify a quote? ...
    (soc.men)
  • Re: OU Maths Degree Standards
    ... known and the you reason forwards until you find x, ... backward to the actual equation involved, this is why the iff is important. ... It can either mean verify or prove and our disagreement is that I take it ... my review of "The nature of proof", which was a Royal Society event ...
    (uk.education.maths)
  • Re: Backup Failing
    ... Backup Runner started. ... Will enumerate on 3 media libraries found. ... Reason: The process cannot access the file because it is being used by ... Operation: Verify After Backup ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • SBS 2003 Backup Fails
    ... I am getting intermittent backup failures. ... Will enumerate on 4 media libraries found. ... Reason: The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process. ... Operation: Verify After Backup ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)