Re: Progressive chess problem
- From: Joost de Heer <joost@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 13:05:26 +0200
Try 8. Ke7 Rb8 Rxb2 g5 g4 gxf3 fxg2 gxh1R#. You might do better with 7.7 Ne2, but then Black's 8th move can swallow up a lot of material, assuming there is no mate. [...]
But there is, with 8. Ke7 Rb8 Rxb2 d4 d3 d2 Ng4 Nxf2#.
You can use Popeye (http://www.xs4all.nl/~sanguis/popeye/ for the latest version) to solve series-mates. Here's the popeye syntax:
Some examples:
>>1. d4 >>2. c5 cxd4 >>3. e4 e5 Bd2 >>4. e6 d3 dxc2 cxd1Q+ >>5. Kxd1 Ba5 Bxd8 Be7 Bxf8 >>6. Kxf8 f5 Nh6 Nc6 d5 Bd7
To find if there's a ser-#7 after black's series of 6:
begin fors r4k1r/pp1b2pp/2s1p2s/3pPp2/8/8/PP3PPP/RS1K1BSR stip ser-#7 opt move maxsol 5 end
>>7. Ba6 Bxb7 Bxa8 Bxc6 Bxd7 Na3 Nf3
To find if there's a ser-#8 after white's series of 7:
begin fors 5k1r/p2B2pp/4p2s/3pPp2/8/S4S2/PP3PPP/R2K3R stip ser-#8 opt move maxsol 5 halfduplex end
Joost -- Du hast mein Herz zerrissen, meine Seele geraubt Das es so enden würde hätt` ich nie geglaubt [Aus der Ruinen -] Ohne Rücksicht auf Verluste, hast Du meine Welt zerstört [L'Âme Immortelle] Eine Welt, die vor kurzem nur uns beiden hat gehört .
- References:
- Progressive chess problem
- From: Iceman
- Re: Progressive chess problem
- From: Iceman
- Re: Progressive chess problem
- From: Dr A. N. Walker
- Re: Progressive chess problem
- From: Iceman
- Re: Progressive chess problem
- From: Iceman
- Re: Progressive chess problem
- From: anw
- Re: Progressive chess problem
- From: anw
- Progressive chess problem
- Prev by Date: Re: Progressive chess problem
- Next by Date: Re: All tied up
- Previous by thread: Re: Progressive chess problem
- Next by thread: Re: Progressive chess problem
- Index(es):