Re: Progressive chess problem
- From: Harold Buck <no_one_knows@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 21:48:30 -0500
In article <1130534881.064215.252320@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Iceman" <oneofcold@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The rules of progressive chess are that white makes one move, then
> black makes two moves, then white makes three moves, then black makes
> four moves, and so on. If you give check, that ends your turn even if
> you have moves left over. If you are in check, you must get out of
> check on the first move of your turn or you lose.
>
> Basically, the problem is: could it be possible for white to force a
> win regardless of what black does? The first five moves are what is
> considered to be the best opening for white and the best black defense.
> In this thread, we are seeing if we can come up with a way either for
> white to force a win or for black to prevent a white win, assuming both
> players play perfectly.
Thanks!
I was parsing this as "progressive 'chess problem'" instead of
"'progressive chess' problem." That makes a big difference!
--Harold Buck
"I used to rock and roll all night,
and party every day.
Then it was every other day. . . ."
-Homer J. Simpson
.
- References:
- Progressive chess problem
- From: Iceman
- Re: Progressive chess problem
- From: Iceman
- Re: Progressive chess problem
- From: Dr A. N. Walker
- Re: Progressive chess problem
- From: Iceman
- Re: Progressive chess problem
- From: Iceman
- Re: Progressive chess problem
- From: Harold Buck
- Re: Progressive chess problem
- From: Iceman
- Progressive chess problem
- Prev by Date: Re: Progressive chess problem
- Next by Date: Re: Please assist with PhD research
- Previous by thread: Re: Progressive chess problem
- Next by thread: Re: Progressive chess problem
- Index(es):