Re: Progressive chess problem
- From: Harold Buck <no_one_knows@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 16:01:29 -0500
In article <1130527730.738079.195350@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Iceman" <oneofcold@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >1. d4
> >2. c5 cxd4
> >3. e4 e5 Bd2
> >4. e6 d3 dxc2 cxd1Q+
> >5. Kxd1 Ba5 Bxd8 Be7 Bxf8
> >6. Kxf8 f5 Nh6 Nc6 d5 Bd7
>
> 7. Ba6 Bxb7 Bxa8 Bxc6 Bxd7 Na3 Nf3
> 8. Ke7 Kxd7 Rb8 Rxb2 Rxf2 Rxg2 Rxh2 Rxh1+
> 9. Ke2 Rxh1 Rxh6 Rxh7 Nb5 Nxa7 Rh1 Rg1 Ng5
>
> On 10, black can't promote his pawns, and can take either the white
> rook or white a2 pawn but not both. So it's a won game for white
> unless I'm missing something.
I don't understand this problem at all.
--Harold Buck
"I used to rock and roll all night,
and party every day.
Then it was every other day. . . ."
-Homer J. Simpson
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Progressive chess problem
- From: Iceman
- Re: Progressive chess problem
- References:
- Progressive chess problem
- From: Iceman
- Re: Progressive chess problem
- From: Iceman
- Re: Progressive chess problem
- From: Dr A. N. Walker
- Re: Progressive chess problem
- From: Iceman
- Re: Progressive chess problem
- From: Iceman
- Progressive chess problem
- Prev by Date: Re: Kramnik Desperate?
- Next by Date: Re: Please assist with PhD research
- Previous by thread: Re: Progressive chess problem
- Next by thread: Re: Progressive chess problem
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|