Re: Recommendation for repetoire book(s)
- From: "Ray Gordon" <ray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 18:58:45 GMT
>> Now it's just a matter of extending my opening book to the point where I
>> can routinely defeat the world's best players without leaving my book.
>> That is how Fischer did it (if you check his games you'll find that he
>> almost never deviated from his repertoire), and that is how I intend to
>> do it.
>
> Almost never deviating from repertoire is not the same thing as winning
> all your games (or even most of them) without leaving book.
Having a 150 mph serve in tennis won't make one a winner, but that doesn't
mean it's a bad way to start building a game.
>> The best example of how Fischer operated was his use of the Poisoned
>> Pawn variation of the Sicilian as black. He didn't like the opening per
>> se, except he loved that every idiot claiming to be his peer would play
>> 10. e5 against it, which he had busted.
>
> That doesn't appear to be the case. The database with Fritz 8 gives
> eleven games in which Fischer plays the black side of the poisoned pawn
> (ECO B97). Chessgames.com only has ten of these games and no others.
Was the first one against Geller?
My books 15 years ago were not as comprehensive as today's databases, keep
in mind. Still, he exploited 10. e5 for all it was worth.
> Of these, the only two against world-class opposition are against Spassky
> in the 1972 World Championship match, where Fischer managed a loss
> (10.Bd3) and a draw (10.Bxf6).
>
> The other games are:
>
> vs Parma Bled 1961 1/2 (38) 13.f5 (no e5)
> vs Bilek Stockholm IZ 1962 0-1 (27) 10.e5
> vs Tringov Havana 1965 0-1 (22) 10.e5
> vs Parma Havana 1965 1/2 (34) 12.f5 (no e5)
> vs Mazzioni Monte Carlo 1967 0-1 (45) 10.e5
> vs Kavalek Sousse IZ 1967 1/2 (28) 10.f5
> vs Matov Vinkovci 1968 0-1 (20) 12.f5 (no e5)
> vs Matulovic Herzeg Novi blitz 1970 0-1 (44) neither e5 nor f5
> vs Parma Rovinj/Zagreb 1970 0-1 (57) neither e5 nor f5
>
> So, only three games with 10.e5, admittedly all won convincingly, but
> hardly against Fischer's peers.
I found more with 10. e5 in other books. I also found 10. f5 in Geller's
"application of chess theory."
>> Players kept thinking that their mistakes were made down the road, and
>> tried to fix the line. It was only when Yefim Geller played the
>> Poisoned Pawn against Fischer that the correct line -- 10. f5 -- was
>> revealed.
>
> You're talking about Fischer-Geller, Monte Carlo 1967, yes?
Yes, that one.
>The game that
> Fischer's wonderful demonstration of the correct line saw him resign after
> 25 moves?
Doesn't matter: the point is that Fischer showed that he played against his
"pet line" differently than most of the world.
Geller was also like kryptonite to Fischer. I don't know why he never
became world champion, because he certainly had the talent.
I still consider Geller to be the strongest opening player, ever, and a lot
of my theories are derived from my study of his work.
>And anyway, by that time, Parma had already obtained two draws
> against Fischer with (a delayed) f5, as you can see above.
Delayed isn't the same.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Recommendation for repetoire book(s)
- From: David Richerby
- Re: Recommendation for repetoire book(s)
- References:
- Re: Recommendation for repetoire book(s)
- From: Antonio Torrecillas
- Re: Recommendation for repetoire book(s)
- From: Major Cat
- Re: Recommendation for repetoire book(s)
- From: Ray Gordon
- Re: Recommendation for repetoire book(s)
- From: David Richerby
- Re: Recommendation for repetoire book(s)
- Prev by Date: Re: Where you can play chess online!!!
- Next by Date: Re: Recommendation for repetoire book(s)
- Previous by thread: Re: Recommendation for repetoire book(s)
- Next by thread: Re: Recommendation for repetoire book(s)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading