ER25 rears its ugly head again...
- From: James Lawrence <james.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 00:34:17 -0700 (PDT)
[This is a question about EBU regulations, though similar may exist in
the US]
Last night, an opponent decided to open an acol 2C with
-
AKQJ865
QT976
7
Does this fall afoul of the extended rule of 25? It doesn't have 16
HCP obviously or hit the ordinary rule of 25, but do we count the long
"clear-cut trick" in diamonds? It seems like with repeated black-suit
forces that trick might never materialise except on a very friendly
trump break.
James.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ER25 rears its ugly head again...
- From: OldPalooka
- Re: ER25 rears its ugly head again...
- From: Michael Angelo Ravera
- Re: ER25 rears its ugly head again...
- From: Gerben Dirksen
- Re: ER25 rears its ugly head again...
- From: rhm
- Re: ER25 rears its ugly head again...
- Prev by Date: Re: Another simple decision
- Next by Date: Re: ER25 rears its ugly head again...
- Previous by thread: Twittering the World Team Championships?
- Next by thread: Re: ER25 rears its ugly head again...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|