Re: Statistics 101
- From: "eleaticus" <eleaticus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 01:28:14 -0600
"Charles Brenner" <cbrenner@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:556f3124-8952-4765-852e-c851a2af68a4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Dec 20, 8:11 pm, "eleaticus" <eleati...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"paul" <paulh...@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
Paul:
Thanks for the effort, I'll resist the temptation to be snide and just
say forget it.
oren:
You have been told by others also.
Charles:
Paul's paradox, as you know and have explained, derives from one-
tailed versus two-tailed significance tests. The problem is that Paul
stipulated in advance that he understands such things. In other words,
he basically admitted that he knows the answer but is not satisfied
with it. Therefore there is nothing mathematical that will satisfy
him. Possibly there exists a really clear exposition using just the
right "magic words" that would, or maybe not.
oren:
Which country commands your efforts in its diplomatic corps?
.
- References:
- Statistics 101
- From: paul
- Re: Statistics 101
- From: paul
- Re: Statistics 101
- From: eleaticus
- Re: Statistics 101
- From: paul
- Re: Statistics 101
- From: eleaticus
- Re: Statistics 101
- From: Charles Brenner
- Statistics 101
- Prev by Date: Re: Robson/Segal summary
- Next by Date: Re: Passing 2C at the U.S. Team Trials
- Previous by thread: Re: Statistics 101
- Next by thread: Re: Statistics 101
- Index(es):