Re: What is your ruling?
- From: Bertel Lund Hansen <unospamo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 14:35:03 +0200
rhm skrev:
I would not feel comfortable after
1H--(4S)--4NT
Neither would I. This sequence would qualify as undiscussed if
your agreement was BW of some sort.
But I do not intend to comment on all possible sequences ending
in 4NT.
--
Bertel, Denmark
http://bridge.lundhansen.dk/
.
- References:
- Re: What is your ruling?
- From: Peter Smulders
- Re: What is your ruling?
- From: Dave Flower
- Re: What is your ruling?
- From: Peter Smulders
- Re: What is your ruling?
- From: rhm
- Re: What is your ruling?
- From: raija d
- Re: What is your ruling?
- From: rhm
- Re: What is your ruling?
- From: Bertel Lund Hansen
- Re: What is your ruling?
- From: rhm
- Re: What is your ruling?
- Prev by Date: Re: Another hesitation problem
- Next by Date: Re: Any Comments/Advice on this Acol Bidding Srquence?
- Previous by thread: Re: What is your ruling?
- Next by thread: Re: What is your ruling?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading