Re: Down with the strong 2C
- From: blackshoe <blackshoe@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2008 19:35:12 -0700 (PDT)
On Sep 20, 8:35 pm, patpowerss...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Instead of the strong 2C, why not a forcing 1C? That is, 1C would
have two meanings, either the usual or any hand that you want to make
sure isn't passed out. 1D denial, of course.
If you want a forcing 1C opening, what's wrong with Precision?
.
- References:
- Down with the strong 2C
- From: patpowersspam
- Down with the strong 2C
- Prev by Date: Re: Kx Ax AKQJx KQ10x
- Next by Date: Re: Kx Ax AKQJx KQ10x
- Previous by thread: Down with the strong 2C
- Next by thread: Re: Down with the strong 2C
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|